Abstract:Studies on the effectiveness of online language teaching have generally centered on basic or intermediate language courses. The present study examines the effectiveness of an advanced-level online Spanish grammar course. Two sections of the course are compared: one is offered face-to-face, and the other is offered fully online. The goals are both to measure students' achievement in the two sections, and to better understand specific challenges faced by online teaching. The study shows that there was significan… Show more
“…These items offer an overall snapshot of student satisfaction levels with the course. With respect to the highest-rated statement (rating of 4.1), learners agreed that the online format enabled more flexibility in learning (the benefit of flexibility and selfpacing in online and hybrid courses has been a finding also noted elsewhere: e.g., Blake & Delforge, 2007;Cubillos, 2007;Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2014;Green & Earnest Youngs, 2001;Murday et al, 2008). However, students would not all recommend taking a summer online advanced-level course (mean rating of 3.1).…”
Section: Satisfaction Levels With the Coursementioning
confidence: 57%
“…In other words, although many students may succeed in this type of flexible learning environment, some may not. Enkin and Mejías-Bikandi (2017) therefore note that learners should be made aware of the structure and nature of an online course before they register for it.…”
Section: Comparative Studies and Learner Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey contained five statements that participants needed to rate using a fivepoint Likert scale (5-strongly agree to 1-strongly disagree) and seven open-ended questions. This survey was adapted and modified from a survey used in previous research on online learning (Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017). The Likert scale items asked participants about their opinions of the effectiveness, format, and design of the course (see Table 1 for items).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another student noted, "I feel like learning a language is difficult to do online by yourself", and another further explained, "I couldn't see as many examples or different explanations [as in a F2F course]." Indeed, lack of F2F support has been noted elsewhere as a drawback in both online and hybrid L2 courses ( Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2014;Murday et al, 2008). However, it is possible that some students may find lack of F2F teacher time especially challenging within the compact nature of a summer online course (and perhaps especially at the advanced level).…”
Section: Lack Of F2f Teacher Time and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have utilized comparative research designs in which hybrid and online courses have been compared to counterpart face-to-face (F2F) courses (e.g., Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2013). The results have shown that learning outcomes in these types of courses are similar to those of F2F courses.…”
“…These items offer an overall snapshot of student satisfaction levels with the course. With respect to the highest-rated statement (rating of 4.1), learners agreed that the online format enabled more flexibility in learning (the benefit of flexibility and selfpacing in online and hybrid courses has been a finding also noted elsewhere: e.g., Blake & Delforge, 2007;Cubillos, 2007;Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2014;Green & Earnest Youngs, 2001;Murday et al, 2008). However, students would not all recommend taking a summer online advanced-level course (mean rating of 3.1).…”
Section: Satisfaction Levels With the Coursementioning
confidence: 57%
“…In other words, although many students may succeed in this type of flexible learning environment, some may not. Enkin and Mejías-Bikandi (2017) therefore note that learners should be made aware of the structure and nature of an online course before they register for it.…”
Section: Comparative Studies and Learner Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey contained five statements that participants needed to rate using a fivepoint Likert scale (5-strongly agree to 1-strongly disagree) and seven open-ended questions. This survey was adapted and modified from a survey used in previous research on online learning (Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017). The Likert scale items asked participants about their opinions of the effectiveness, format, and design of the course (see Table 1 for items).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another student noted, "I feel like learning a language is difficult to do online by yourself", and another further explained, "I couldn't see as many examples or different explanations [as in a F2F course]." Indeed, lack of F2F support has been noted elsewhere as a drawback in both online and hybrid L2 courses ( Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2014;Murday et al, 2008). However, it is possible that some students may find lack of F2F teacher time especially challenging within the compact nature of a summer online course (and perhaps especially at the advanced level).…”
Section: Lack Of F2f Teacher Time and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have utilized comparative research designs in which hybrid and online courses have been compared to counterpart face-to-face (F2F) courses (e.g., Enkin & Mejías-Bikandi, 2017;Gascoigne & Parnell, 2013). The results have shown that learning outcomes in these types of courses are similar to those of F2F courses.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.