The effectiveness of Kinesio taping on pain and clinical features in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan; Aytekin, Meltem Güneş; Ay, Saime; Ergin, Süreyya

doi:10.5606/tftrd.2018.1896

Cited by 24 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some studies compared the effect of KT to placebo taping on pain and disability. In line with our findings, some studies showed that the levels of pain and disability significantly decreased after taping [18,[32][33][34], and some reported that KT is better than placebo taping in patients with CLBP [32,34,35]. On the other hand, some studies found no significant decrease in pain or disability after the intervention [36,37], and that the application of KT was not better than placebo taping for patients with CLBP [31,33,37], which is contradicted with our findings.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Short-term effect of kinesiology taping on pain, functional disability and lumbar proprioception in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a double-blinded, randomized trial

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to evaluate the effect of kinesiology taping (KT) on lumbar proprioception, pain, and functional disability in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Thirty individuals with nonspecific CLBP participated in this double-blinded, randomized clinical trial from July 2017 to September 2018. The participants were randomized into two groups: KT (n = 15) and placebo group (n = 15). KT was applied with 15–25% tension for 72 h, and placebo taping was used without tension. Lumbar repositioning error was measured by a bubble inclinometer at three different angles (45° and 60° flexion, and 15° extension) in upright standing. Pain and disability were assessed by the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index, respectively. All measurements were recorded at baseline and 3 days after taping. Results Pain and disability scores reduced 3 days after taping in the KT group with large effect sizes (p < 0.05). Only the total score of pain was significantly different between the groups 3 days after taping and improved more in the KT group with a large effect size (p < 0.05). However, lumbar repositioning errors were similar between the groups after 3 days (p > 0.05). Also, only constant error of 15° extension showed a moderate correlation with disability (r = 0.39, p = 0.02). Conclusion KT can decrease pain and disability scores after 3 days of application. Although placebo taping can reduce pain, the effect of KT is higher than placebo taping. The findings do not support the therapeutic effect of KT and placebo taping as a tool to enhance lumbar proprioception in patients with nonspecific CLBP. Trial registration The study prospectively registered on 21.05.2018 at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20090301001722N20.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 58%

“…The previous studies never evaluated the effects of KT on pain using SF-MPQ as a multidimensional tool in individuals with nonspecific CLBP, and they measured pain by VAS [18,32,34] or NRS [33,[35][36][37]. The current study is the first to assess the effects of KT on pain using SF-MPQ in individuals with nonspecific CLBP.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Short-term effect of kinesiology taping on pain, functional disability and lumbar proprioception in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a double-blinded, randomized trial

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were twenty-three RCTs related to conditions of the lumbar spine and abdominal wall, with all but one assessing KT (Appendix 2 File: Appendix 2G). One addressed KT for acute low back pain [136], two investigated KT for back pain in the setting of lumbar disc herniation [137,138], two investigated KT for pregnancy related low back pain [139,140], one RCT investigated postpartum diastasis recti abdominis [141], and sixteen investigated KT for chronic low back pain, [142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157]. One study evaluated rigid taping for sacroiliac joint dysfunction [158].…”

Section: Lumbar Spinementioning

confidence: 99%

Taping for conditions of the musculoskeletal system: an evidence map review

Cupler

Alrwaily

Polakowski³

et al. 2020

Chiropr Man Therap

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Taping is a common treatment modality used by many rehabilitation providers. Several types of tapes and taping methods are used in the treatment of musculoskeletal dysfunction and pain. Purpose To summarize and map the evidence related to taping methods used for various joints and conditions of the musculoskeletal system, and to provide clinicians and researchers with a user-friendly reference with organized evidence tables. Data sources The PEDro, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PubMed, and PROSPERO databases were searched from inception through October 31, 2019. Study selection Eligible studies were selected by two independent reviewers and included either systematic reviews (SRs) or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and included a musculoskeletal complaint using a clinical outcome measure. Data extraction Data was extracted by two investigators independently. Risk of bias and quality were assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) for SRs or the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for RCTs. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019122857). Data synthesis Twenty-five musculoskeletal conditions were summarized from forty-one SRs and 127 RCTs. There were 6 SRs and 49 RCTs for spinal conditions. Kinesio tape was the most common type of tape considered. Four evidence tables representing the synthesized SRs and RCTs were produced and organized by body region per condition. Limitations Inclusion of only English language studies. Also, the heterogeneous nature of the included studies prevented a meta-analysis. Conclusions There is mixed quality evidence of effectiveness for the different types of taping methods for different body regions and conditions. All of the SRs and RCTs found during our search of the taping literature have been organized into a series of appendices. A synthesis of the results have been placed in evidence tables that may serve as a useful guide to clinicians and researchers.

show abstract

“…[ 10 – 12 ] KT is an elastic bonding material with high tensile capacity, which ensures the free movement of the application area without the need for chemicals. [ 13 ] KT can be extended to 140% of the original length, providing a good range of motion compared with other types of tape. Studies have shown that KT improves blood and lymph circulation, mitigates pain, adjusts joints, and relives muscle tension.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of kinesio taping and sham taping in patients with chronic low back pain

Wang

Lü

et al. 2020

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a clinical condition characterized by moderate to severe pain in the lower spine that severely affects the patient's life experience and leads to disability and absenteeism. In the past few years, kinesio tape (KT) have been utilized by physiotherapists as a relatively novel band-aid method to reduce the pain of musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, in this particular study, we intended to search the effects of KT and sham KT on pain, lumbar range of motion, and disability for CLBP. Methods: The present study was experimented in a physiotherapy clinic in the Yancheng First People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province. The study design was a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Inclusion criteria for the study were the followings: chief complaint pain in the area between 12 ribs and hip creases with or without leg pain; ages ranges from 18 to 65; low back pain lasts <6 weeks; and at any rate medium pain intensity (pain score ≥4). Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 parallel combinations to receive either therapeutic KT or sham KT. Patients were assessed at baseline, at the end of the 12-day intervention, and at 4 weeks of follow-up. The main result measure was pain intensity using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and the secondary outcome measure was lumbar lateral flexion activity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and adverse effects including allergic reactions or skin problems. Conclusions: The results of this study will provide new information about the usefulness of KT as an additional component of a guideline-endorsed physiotherapy program in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Trial registration: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6070).

show abstract

The effectiveness of Kinesio taping on pain and clinical features in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Cited by 24 publications

References 28 publications

Short-term effect of kinesiology taping on pain, functional disability and lumbar proprioception in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a double-blinded, randomized trial

Short-term effect of kinesiology taping on pain, functional disability and lumbar proprioception in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a double-blinded, randomized trial

Taping for conditions of the musculoskeletal system: an evidence map review

Comparison of kinesio taping and sham taping in patients with chronic low back pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About