2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for personality disorders when comparing treatment-as-usual and bona fide treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
51
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the relative benefits of the available SUD/PTSD treatments are unclear because these treatments have been compared to a heterogeneous group of control conditions ranging from manualized SUD care matched to the experimental interventions on time and attention, SUD‐oriented treatment as usual (TAU), to attention placebos, minimal care, and no care. Variability in the quality of control conditions may influence the estimation of treatment effects (Budge et al., ; Wampold et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the relative benefits of the available SUD/PTSD treatments are unclear because these treatments have been compared to a heterogeneous group of control conditions ranging from manualized SUD care matched to the experimental interventions on time and attention, SUD‐oriented treatment as usual (TAU), to attention placebos, minimal care, and no care. Variability in the quality of control conditions may influence the estimation of treatment effects (Budge et al., ; Wampold et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Budge et al, 2013) rather than use a control group (see Bamelis et al, 2014 for a notable exception), which is reflected in the fact that no treatment for a non-BPD PD currently meets APA Division 12 criteria to be an “evidence-based treatment.” One disadvantage to comparing specialized therapies head-to-head without an active control group or a dismantling design (e.g., that therapists cannot use a particular technique in one group but are encouraged to in the other) is that it is unclear to what extent techniques uniquely provided or emphasized by a given specialized therapy for PD (e.g., affect-focused PDT for Cluster-C patients; McCullough et al, 2003) are responsible for any observed change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, we found higher but decreasing effects in short‐term outpatient and short‐term inpatient psychotherapies and lower but increasing effects in long‐term outpatient and long‐term inpatient psychotherapies. This led to insignificant differences between treatment groups at long‐term follow‐up, which is in line with earlier effectiveness studies on psychotherapeutical treatments and supports the conclusion that differences in effectiveness of active treatments in PD are negligible, also called ‘equivalence effect’ or ‘dodo‐bird effect’ (Wampold et al ., ; Budge et al ., ). Five possible explanations for the results found are set out hereafter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%