The Effectiveness of Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Substance Addictions: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background and AimsCognitive bias modification (CBM) interventions, presumably targeting automatic processes, are considered particularly promising for addictions. We conducted a meta-analysis examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CBM for substance addiction outcomes.MethodsStudies were identified through systematic searches in bibliographical databases. We included RCTs of CBM interventions, alone or in combination with other treatments, for any type of addiction. We examined trial risk of bias, publication bias and possible moderators. Effects sizes were computed for post-test and follow-up, using a random-effects model. We grouped outcome measures and reported results for addiction (all related measures), craving and cognitive bias.ResultsWe identified 25 trials, 18 for alcohol problems, and 7 for smoking. At post-test, there was no significant effect of CBM for addiction, g = 0.08 (95% CI -0.02 to 0.18) or craving, g = 0.05 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.16), but there was a significant, moderate effect on cognitive bias, g = 0.60 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.79). Results were similar for alcohol and smoking outcomes taken separately. Follow-up addiction outcomes were reported in 7 trials, resulting in a small but significant effect of CBM, g = 0.18 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.32). Results for addiction and craving did not differ by substance type, sample type, delivery setting, bias targeted or number of sessions. Risk of bias was high or uncertain in most trials, for most criteria considered. Meta-regression analyses revealed significant inverse relationships between risk of bias and effect sizes for addiction outcomes and craving. The relationship between cognitive bias and respectively addiction ESs was not significant. There was consistent evidence of publication bias in the form of funnel plot asymmetry.ConclusionsOur results cast serious doubts on the clinical utility of CBM interventions for addiction problems, but sounder methodological trials are necessary before this issue can be settled. We found no indication that positive effects on biases translate into effects on addiction outcomes.

Gamified Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Psychiatric Disorders: Review (Preprint)

“…Modification of these automatic biases could be achieved with tasks such as the visual-probe task (which involves the repeated pairing of probes with neutral stimulus) (6); the approach/avoidance task (which involves presenting the salient stimulus in a push-away format) (7); and lastly cognitive bias modification for interpretation (which involves training individuals to disambiguate ambiguous scenarios in a positive way) (8). Prior reviews have synthesised the evidence for cognitive bias modification (Cristea et (9)'s review, 25 trials involving participants with alcohol and tobacco disorder were identified, and they found bias modification to be effective for attentional and approach biases, with an effect size of 0.60 (Hedge G). Jones et al (2017) reviewed meta-analyses and reported that cognitive bias modification was effective for anxiety disorders, with effect sizes ranging from 0.13 to 0.74 (10).…”

Web-Based Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Psychiatric Disorders: Scoping Review (Preprint)

“…However, they reported no effects of bias modification on other addiction outcomes or on craving (9). A commentary published (10) in response to this meta-analysis (9) highlighted that a mixture of clinical and non-clinical studies have been included in the evidence synthesis and if only clinical studies were considered, the qualitative synthesis demonstrates that there was a significant effect of bias modification. For anxiety and depressive disorders, there remains to be small effect sizes (Hedges g of 0.37) for the bias modification (Cristea et al, 2015), based on a prior evaluation of 49 trials (11).…”

Mobile Phone Cognitive Bias Modification Research Platform for Substance Use Disorders: Protocol for a Feasibility Study (Preprint)

“…Cristea et al (2016) (4) in their meta-analysis considered the effect size of attentional bias modification on cognitive biases, as well as on addiction-related outcomes and cravings. The metaanalysis included 25 randomised trials involving individuals with either alcohol use or tobacco use disorders.…”