2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of clinical education models for undergraduate nursing programs: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cost savings, time flexibility, and content utility are benefits of this module in the delivery of communication instruction that is rigorous and evidence based. A recent review of undergraduate nursing programs concluded that continuing education models provide greater engagement and enhanced learning [21]. Although clinical communication skills are preferably and systematically taught by the clinical preceptor model, research has shown that this teaching strategy is limited by busy clinicians who often struggle to meet patient caseloads while also serving as preceptors to nursing students, sidelining content about family and patient communication [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost savings, time flexibility, and content utility are benefits of this module in the delivery of communication instruction that is rigorous and evidence based. A recent review of undergraduate nursing programs concluded that continuing education models provide greater engagement and enhanced learning [21]. Although clinical communication skills are preferably and systematically taught by the clinical preceptor model, research has shown that this teaching strategy is limited by busy clinicians who often struggle to meet patient caseloads while also serving as preceptors to nursing students, sidelining content about family and patient communication [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Although increased attention is now being given to alternative practice learning models, [6] more than 150 years since the first formal nurse education programmes were established [7] there is still only limited evidence available regarding exactly what creates a good placement. [8] As a result, within both nursing [9][10][11][12] and other health and social care disciplines [4,[13][14][15][16][17] there have been calls for further research to identify the most effective practice learning models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stephenson [26] asserts that the clinical education framework in a programme is one of three key factors which affect placement learning experiences, the other two being the specific characteristics of the practice learning environment and the quality of student supervision. Nevertheless, many of the different practice learning models described and evaluated in nursing literature, for example the 'clinical education unit', [12] 'clinical partnership', [11] 'cluster', [2] 'collaborative learning unit' [27] and 'team preceptorship' [28] models, focus solely on the supervisory practices of clinicians and educators and therefore fail to consider any potential influence of the duration and intensity of a practicum on the nature of the student's clinical learning experience. As Cleak and Zuchowski [29] comment, quality supervision can be present or absent in practice education within any placement model and since 'the location and structure of placements may affect outcomes', [30] arguably it is equally important to examine both variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] To date, there is lack of evidence identifying the effectiveness of this model as "best practice" with respect to student learning and patient safety. [3] Students and faculty who participate in TCM often report limited time available for individual student teaching and supervision, being viewed by clinical staff as visitors, and lack of professional role development. [2] The most concerning challenge of the TCM cited in the literature is the inability of the faculty to effectively balance student learning and patient safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%