2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment and Rechallenge—A Systematic Review

Abstract: Despite a great success of immunotherapy in cancer treatment, a great number of patients will become resistant. This review summarizes recent reports on immune checkpoint inhibitor retreatment or rechallenge in order to overcome primary resistance. The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. In total, 31 articles were included with a total of 812 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, will the patients with aCC whose tumors progress on or after prior anti-PD-1 ICI benefit from PD-L1 inhibition in a subsequent line, or vice versa? To our knowledge, there is no proof-of-concept prospective trial for anti-PD(L)1 ICI re-treatment or rechallenge upon relapse or PD, respectively, in solid tumor oncology although retrospective experiences for other cancer types suggest feasibility of this approach, with greater clinical benefit in patients who derived disease control from a preceding course of ICI and less so in those who received intervening treatment(s) between 2 ICI courses [ 38 39 40 ]. These are questions which are best clarified by well-designed clinical trials, ideally with preplanned biospecimen collection for translational research.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, will the patients with aCC whose tumors progress on or after prior anti-PD-1 ICI benefit from PD-L1 inhibition in a subsequent line, or vice versa? To our knowledge, there is no proof-of-concept prospective trial for anti-PD(L)1 ICI re-treatment or rechallenge upon relapse or PD, respectively, in solid tumor oncology although retrospective experiences for other cancer types suggest feasibility of this approach, with greater clinical benefit in patients who derived disease control from a preceding course of ICI and less so in those who received intervening treatment(s) between 2 ICI courses [ 38 39 40 ]. These are questions which are best clarified by well-designed clinical trials, ideally with preplanned biospecimen collection for translational research.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity of non-metastatic tdLNs to act as an ongoing source of TCF-1+ TSL, as recently reported 7-9 , could become dysregulated by PD-1 checkpoint immunotherapy, leading to impaired long-term maintenance of high affinity TSL clones in the tdLNs, the loss of which could be permanent due to reduced naïve T cell output from the adult thymus 60,61 . Recent clinical evidence reporting a declining efficacy of repetitive checkpoint treatment in patients experiencing tumor relapse fits with this view 62 . Finally, our findings indicate that partial blockade of PD-1 pathway could avoid loss of high affinity TSL at the price of decreased anti-tumor efficacy in any single round of treatment, suggesting that a 'sweet spot' could be found through careful titration of checkpoint blockade antibody dosage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Lastly, immunotherapy to treat cancer has gained some successes and stimulated new excitement in recent years (Ribas and Wolchok, 2018;Esfahani et al, 2020;Perdyan et al, 2023). The new developments enable the engineering of immune cells targeting specific cancer antigens, and also provide strategies to active the immune system by blocking the ability of cancer cells to evade immune cells.…”
Section: Cancer Treatment/therapymentioning
confidence: 99%