The effectiveness of a CBT-based intervention for depression symptoms with a female forensic inpatient with cognitive disability and autism

Ashworth, Sarah; Bamford, Jennifer; Tully, Ruth J.

doi:10.1080/14789949.2020.1754445

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Twenty-two peer-reviewed articles around issues of risk in U.K. inpatient forensic settings for people with an intellectual disability were deemed suitable for inclusion. Of these, seven were quantitative/experimental designs (Campbell & McCue, 2013;Chester et al, 2017Chester et al, , 2018Fitzgerald et al, 2013;Hogue et al, 2007;Morris et al, 2021;Novaco & Taylor, 2015), five were qualitative (Duperouzel & Fish, 2010;Lovell et al, 2014;Malda-Castillo et al, 2018;Wright et al, 2014;Wood et al, 2008), four cohort studies (Russell et al, 2018;Lindsay, Carson, et al, 2013;Lindsay et al, 2012), There were two service evaluations/ audits (Alexander et al, 2015;Plant et al, 2011), two survey designs (Fish et al, 2012;Mason et al, 2011), one case study (Ashworth et al, 2020) and one study utilising the Delphi approach (Morrissey et al, 2017). Setting: forensic psychiatric hospital units The intellectual disability and non-ID groups were strikingly similar on many sociodemographic, clinical and forensic variables.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk for intellectual disability populations in inpatient forensic settings in the United Kingdom: A literature review

Quinn

Rhynas

Gowland

et al. 2022

Research Intellect Disabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background People with an intellectual disability who commit a criminal offence can be detained, by a court, in a forensic inpatient facility. There is limited understanding of how inpatients with an intellectual disability and their nurses navigate risk in U.K. forensic services. Methods A traditional literature review design was followed to map evidence (2000–2021) around the forensic and health and wellbeing risks faced by inpatients with an intellectual disability, nurses' perceptions of managing risk, and patient experiences of informing risk assessment and management. Papers were analysed thematically. Results Findings suggest that restrictive measures to mitigate forensic risks (e.g., violence) can exacerbate the risk of poor health and wellbeing outcomes. There was some limited evidence of direct patient involvement in risk assessment and management. Conclusion Further research is required to explore how forensic inpatients with an intellectual disability can have input in care planning, risk assessment and management.

show abstract