The Effectiveness and Trustworthiness of Faith‐Based and Other Service Organizations: A Study of Recipients' Perceptions

Abstract

Drawing on a new community study of more than 2,000 residents of low-income neighborhoods, we examine information about the kinds of service organizations respondents have contacted for assistance and the perceptions of these respondents about the effectiveness and trustworthiness of those organizations. We compare contact with and perceptions of faith-based organizations, nonsectarian organizations, government agencies, hospitals, and churches and employ a method that takes account of respondents' varying portfolios of service providers. The results indicate that the recipients of faith-based organizations resemble those of the public welfare department in the extent of financial need and scope of family problems, and differ significantly from recipients of help from congregations. The results also indicate that recipients' evaluations of the effectiveness and trustworthiness of their portfolio of service organizations are lower when they have sought assistance from public welfare agencies and higher when they have sought assistance from congregations, but are not significantly affected by having contacted faith-based or nonsectarian organizations.

Engaging a Spirit From the East: Asian American Christians and Civic Life

“…Tropman (2002) suggests that Protestants are more individualistic while Catholics are more community-oriented (also see Menjivar 2003). Although the issue is hotly debated, and research has been hampered by the limitations of survey data, some have suggested that evangelical Protestants are less involved in many aspects of civic life than Catholics or mainline Protestants, instead opting to participate mainly within their own religious communities (Bellah et al 1992;Chaves et al 2002;Ecklund 2005b;Wilson and Janoski 1995;Wuthnow 1995). Others have suggested that evangelicals are increasingly becoming civically involved with the broader society ), but the debate is far from resolved.…”

Religion and Social-political Action: The Catholic Church, Catholic Charities, and the American Welfare State

“…Both the Clinton and the Bush administration opted for a so-called charitable choice solution. Faithbased organizations providing social services should be allowed to have the same chance to apply for public finances as non-religious groups and should not be forced to surrender their religious symbols and character when they work with clients (see Ebaugh et al, 2003;Wuthnow et al, 2004). The main proponents of these ideas have been evangelicals and the Christian Right.…”

“…However, social scientific research on Catholic Charities does not exist. A new interest in so-called faith-based organizations that render social services can be observed (Ebaugh, 2003;Wuthnow et al, 2004) but no particular emphasis is given to Catholic Charities. Although, Catholic Charities' activities can be adequately reconstructed for the period up to the New Deal and as annual reports and similar publications can be relied on for the 1990s, the 1960s and 1970s are poorly documented and a remarkable lack of information and research is evident for this period.…”

Charitable Choice: The Religious Component of the US-Welfare-Reform — Theoretical and Methodological Reflections on "Faith-Based-Organizations" as Social Service Agencies

“…In their brilliant micro-level-analysis, Wuthnow et al account for a significant specialization as to single welfare issues: e.g. FBOs prove most attractive for emotional support while financial aid, housing and food is rather sought from government agencies (Wuthnow et al 2003).…”