The Effectiveness against Traffic Violations with Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE)

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement against traffic violations with Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) and to identify and analyze the obstacles in law enforcement against traffic violations with Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) and find out the solutions. This research is an empirical juridical research by combining legal materials (which are secondary data) with primary data obtained in the field. The results of this study indicate that the effectiveness of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) is still less effective in its implementation, judging from the data on violations that are still occurring, which are increasing compared to before the implementation of the ETLE system. Public awareness of compliance in driving on the road is still lacking and tends to ignore traffic signs because there are no police officers on the road. The factor for the ineffectiveness of implementing Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) is the lack of camera equipment installed on every road and every traffic light so that there is a lack of valid data to detect traffic violators and also there are still many violators found on the highway, especially motorcycle riders who do not drive in an orderly manner in the absence of police officers on duty on the road.

Analysis of Readiness to Apply Etle (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement) Traffic Unit of Wajo Police in Wajo Regency

“…Edi Saputra Hasibuan (2019: 63) states that in an effort to control traffic on roads that are comfortable, safe, and controlled, the government issues a policy in the form of laws and regulations relating to traffic and also for road transportation contained in Article 249, Article 272 Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, as for the implementation of this matter, it is also contained in Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 80 of 2012 concerning Procedures for Inspection of Motorized Vehicles on the Road and Enforcement of Traffic and Road Transportation Violations. As an effort to control traffic, it is usually carried out by police officers, but basically it is also mandatory for all elements of road users (Nurdin, 2011;Organization, 2015;Yuliantoro & Sulchan, 2021).…”

“…Traffic violations that are prone to occur in Indonesia (Prasetyono, 2022;Sa'diyah & Enggarsasi, 2018;Siagian et al, 2014;Yuliantoro & Sulchan, 2021), one of which is due to the Indonesian people who do not obey traffic rules so that cases of violations and the risk of accidents (Joewono & Susilo, 2017;Restuputri et al, 2022;Susilo et al, 2015;Tampubolon, 2021) are still high." In addition, the number of cases of illegal levies in traffic violations also contributes to a poor perception of law enforcement.…”

An Approach for Discovering Urban Transport Service Problem Based on Hotline

“…Analogously in Topic 3 about attitude and behavior, various authors have discussed of-site law enforcement methods used by the Taxi Trafc Enforcement Corps [49]. To address dangerous driving violations, several appropriate measures can be implemented.…”

Prosecution of Traffic Violators According to Law Number 22 Year 2009

“…Agus assessed that Dahlan may have violated Article 48 and Article 49 of Law No. 22 of 2009 concerning road traffic and transportation (Yuliantoro & Sulchan, 2021). However, he refused to mention the threats from those articles, the police will process the matter later which will state the judge's sanctions.…”