2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.00696
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effective Higgs potential and vacuum decay in Starobinsky inflation

Andreas Mantziris,
Tommi Markkanen,
Arttu Rajantie

Abstract: Based on the current experimental data, the Standard Model predicts that the current vacuum state of the Universe is metastable, leading to a non-zero rate of vacuum decay through nucleation of bubbles of true vacuum. Our existence implies that there cannot have been any such bubble nucleation events anywhere in our whole past lightcone. We consider a minimal scenario of the Standard Model together with Starobinsky inflation, using three-loop renormalization group improved Higgs effective potential with one-lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• In appendix A, we presented the flux-over-population method [19] for finding the escape rate from a false minimum in our framework. Such method has been considered in cosmology for studying phase transitions in de Sitter spacetime [58], with potential application the study of vacuum survival during inflation [59]. The main result of this appendix is the analytical formula for the decay rate given in equation (A.15) (and reproduced in (3.8), that is compared with the decay rate extracted from the numerical solution to the FP equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• In appendix A, we presented the flux-over-population method [19] for finding the escape rate from a false minimum in our framework. Such method has been considered in cosmology for studying phase transitions in de Sitter spacetime [58], with potential application the study of vacuum survival during inflation [59]. The main result of this appendix is the analytical formula for the decay rate given in equation (A.15) (and reproduced in (3.8), that is compared with the decay rate extracted from the numerical solution to the FP equation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%