The effective concentration of red betel leaf (Piper crocatum) infusion as root canal irrigant solution

Pangabdian, Fani; Soetanto, Slamet; Suardita, Ketut

doi:10.20473/j.djmkg.v45.i1.p12-16

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Saponin pada DJB merangsang pembentukan kolagen, yang merupakan protein utama pada jaringan ikat dan tulang. 13,14 Perlakuan kedua yaitu irigasi saluran akar dengan APJN 100% menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan tingkat ketahanan fraktur. Dengan kata lain, irigasi saluran akar dengan menggunakan APJN 100% memiliki pengaruh terhadap dinding saluran akar karena pada saat APJN diaplikasikan ke dalam saluran akar debris dentin dapat larut dengan APJN.…”

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

Differences in fracture resistance after root canal irrigation using guava leaf extract (Psidium guajava L.) and lime juice (Citrus aurantifolia)

Arifin

Anas

Nursakia

2022

MDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After root canal treatment, teeth are at higher risk of fracture than vital teeth; the cause is multifactorial, both iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic. Guava are often usedbecause the leaves have been proven to treat various diseases. Guava leaves contain active ingre-dients, including tannins, flavonoids, essential oils and saponins.Lime is often processed by the community as a fresh drink, such as warm lime juice. Lime fruit has useful ingredients such as essential oils, citric acid, amino acids and saponins. The aim of this study was to analyze differences in fracture resistance after root canal irrigation between 60% GL extract and 100% lime juice. This is a laboratory experiment using extracts of GL, LJ, maxillary central incisor with a post-test only control group design, which was tested statistically by using one-way Anova followed by a post hoc test. Fracture resistance in the 60% GL extract group averaged is 45.07±9.80; while the 100% LJ group is40.86±12.71; the differ is 4,280. It was concluded that there is no significant difference in the degree of fracture resistance between the 60% GL and 100% LJextract groups as root canal irriga-gation materials.

show abstract

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

Differences in fracture resistance after root canal irrigation using guava leaf extract (Psidium guajava L.) and lime juice (Citrus aurantifolia)

Arifin

Anas

Nursakia

2022

MDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The differences between mangosteen peel extract irrigant and NaOCl 2.5% on root canal cleanliness

Santoso

Samadi

Prasetyo

et al. 2020

CDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Preparation, one of the stages in root canal treatment, always producesdebrisas aresultof instrumentation onroot canalwalls. Debrisconsistsoforganicand inorganicmaterials. Irrigation need to be performed in every preparation so that debrisandmicroorganisms can be removed from root canal wallsthrough flushingmechanism. NaOCl 2.5% is the most popular irrigant used in root canal treatment. However, NaOCl2.5% onlyworks onorganic tissue. Mangosteenpeel extractcontainsvariousactive compounds, such as saponin. Saponin acts assurfactantso as tolower thesurface tension and remove debris from the root canalwalls. Purpose: to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls following irrigation with NaOCl 2.5% and mangosteen peel extract. Method: Eighteen mandible premolar extracted for orthodontics necessity were used in this study. The teeth were divided into three groups, in which each group consists of six teeth. All of them were instrumented with ProTaper for Hand Use and irrigated. Group 1 used aquadest as irrigant, group 2 used NaOCl 2,5%, and group 3 used mangosteen peel extract 400 ug/ml. The roots were split longitudinally into halves and in 1/3 of apex. The surface of the canal walls were examined using scanning electron microscope. Photomicrographs were scored by three independent observers and statistically tested. Result: There were significant differences between three groups (p<0.05). Group 3, irrigated with mangosteen peel extract 400 ug/ml, had the smallest median score that was 1. Conclusion: Mangosteen peel extract is moreeffective thanNaOCl 2.5% incleaningroot canalwall from debris.

show abstract

The Difference of Irrigant Solution between Red Pine Extract (Pinus densiflora) and Green Pine Extract (Pinus merkusii) Against Cleanliness of Root Canal Walls

Wahjuningrum

Setyabudi

Sukaton

et al. 2020

CDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Smear layer is an accumulation of organic material, debris, and inorganic material in root canal wall. Irrigant solution must be able to eliminate organic and inorganic materials. Herbal extract such as pine contain saponins that can dissolve organic and inorganic materials. Korea is a country that has used pine in this case red pine as an antibacterial medicament. In Indonesia, there are also green pine species. Purpose: To explain the differences in cleanliness of the root canals after irrigation using extracts of red pine (Pinus densiflora) and green pine (Pinus merkusii). Methods: This study used twenty-seven mandibular premolar teeth which were divided into 3 groups each group consisted of 9 premolar teeth. All samples were prepared using ProTaper for Hand Use and irrigated. Group I was irrigated using 2.5% NaOCl, group II was irrigated with red pine extract, and group III was irrigated using green pine extract. Tooth that has been prepared, were cut vertically into 2 and cut horizontally in 1/3 apical section. The root canal surface was observed using a scanning electron microscope. Photomicrograph was observed by three observers using a score and performed an analysis test. Results: There were no difference between red pine (Pinus densiflora) and green pine (Pinus merkusii) in root canal cleanliness with a significance value of 0.169 (p> 0.05) Conclusion: Red pine extract had the same smear layer cleaning power as green pine extract.

show abstract

The effective concentration of red betel leaf (Piper crocatum) infusion as root canal irrigant solution

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Differences in fracture resistance after root canal irrigation using guava leaf extract (Psidium guajava L.) and lime juice (Citrus aurantifolia)

Differences in fracture resistance after root canal irrigation using guava leaf extract (Psidium guajava L.) and lime juice (Citrus aurantifolia)

The differences between mangosteen peel extract irrigant and NaOCl 2.5% on root canal cleanliness

The Difference of Irrigant Solution between Red Pine Extract (Pinus densiflora) and Green Pine Extract (Pinus merkusii) Against Cleanliness of Root Canal Walls

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About