The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background Strength training set organisation and its relationship to the development of muscular strength have yet to be clearly defined. Current meta-analytical research suggests that different population groups have distinctive muscular adaptations, primarily due to the prescription of the strength training set dose. Objectives We conducted a meta-analysis with restrictive inclusion criteria and examined the potential effects of low (LWS), medium (MWS) or high weekly set (HWS) strength training on muscular strength per exercise. Secondly, we examined strength gain variations when performing multi-joint or isolation exercises, and probed for a potential relationship between weekly set number and stage of subjects' training (trained versus untrained). Methods Computerised searches were performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, SWETSWISE, EMBASE and SPORTDiscus TM using the terms 'strength training', 'resistance training', 'single sets', 'multiple sets' and 'volume'. As of September 2016, 6962 potentially relevant studies were identified. After review, nine studies were deemed eligible per pre-set inclusion criteria. Primary data were pooled using a random-effect model. Outcomes for strength gain, strength gain with multi-joint and isolation exercise were analysed for main effects. Sensitivity analyses were calculated for several subgroups by separating the data set and by calculation of separate analyses for each subgroup. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran Q and I 2 statistics. Conclusion This meta-analysis presents additional evidence regarding a graded dose-response relationship between weekly sets performed and strength gain. The use of MWS and HWS was more effective than LWS, with LWS producing the smallest pre-to post-training strength difference. For novice and intermediate male trainees, the findings suggest that LWSs do not lead to strength gains compared with MWS or HWS training. For those trainees in the middle ground, not a novice and not advanced, the existing data provide a relationship between weekly sets and strength gain as set configurations produced different pre-to post-training strength increases. For well trained individuals, the use of either MWS or HWS may be an appropriate dose to produce strength gains. Key PointsMedium (MWS) or high weekly set (HWS) strength training is marginally more effective in producing strength gains than low weekly set (LWS) strength training.The use of either MWS or HWS training may be an appropriate dose to produce strength gains for well trained males.For male trainees at novice and intermediate level, MWS training is more effective than LWS training for both multi-joint and isolation exercises.For those trainees in the middle ground (not a novice or advanced), the existing data provide evidence of a pre-to post-graded set dose-response relationship in strength for both multi-joint and isolation exercises.

Is the weekly sets volume training performed by trained subjects in accordance with training recommendations guidelines for muscle hypertrophy?

“…A growing number of studies have attempted to establish the association between the number of sets performed for each muscle group and the consequent neuromuscular adaptation in different populations 4,12 . Recently, Schoenfeld, Ogborn and Krieger 4 demonstrated an increase of ~0.36% in the hypertrophic response for each additional set performed in a training session.…”

Autophagy is induced by resistance exercise in young men, but unfolded protein response is induced regardless of age

“…An acute bout of resistance exercise (RE) with sufficient load and volume induces skeletal muscle remodelling that leads within few months of training to increases in muscle size and strength . These adaptations are accompanied by numerous benefits for health and performance, yet many of the underlying cellular mechanisms leading to the specific adaptations are not yet fully understood.…”

The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Prescribing Load on Maximal Strength Development: A Systematic Review

“…with prescription methods used to elicit improvements in maximal strength, specifically the manipulation of training volume and load [8][9][10].…”