2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of wealth-based anti-expectation behaviors on public cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are proposing a more pragmatic selection criterion motivated by the empirical evidence [9][10][11][12][13][14] that individuals within a group, besides maximize their utilities, may also have fairness motivations, which can be manifested as an aversion to inequality, and so contributing to the search of a group's agreement. In fact, cooperation between individuals has been an important factor for the maintenance of human beings' lives and ongoing research efforts are been carried out in order to understand the emergence of cooperative group decisions [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Nevertheless, in order to distinguish the type of frameworks available for games modelling, here we are interested in group decisions having some kind of coordination, which does not lay necessarily in the approach of cooperative games, since the term co-operate means that two or more individuals are operating as a unique entity, which is not the case of the problem addressed here, but illustrates quite well the same idea, of individuals autonomously orienting their behaviour toward a mutual benefit solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are proposing a more pragmatic selection criterion motivated by the empirical evidence [9][10][11][12][13][14] that individuals within a group, besides maximize their utilities, may also have fairness motivations, which can be manifested as an aversion to inequality, and so contributing to the search of a group's agreement. In fact, cooperation between individuals has been an important factor for the maintenance of human beings' lives and ongoing research efforts are been carried out in order to understand the emergence of cooperative group decisions [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Nevertheless, in order to distinguish the type of frameworks available for games modelling, here we are interested in group decisions having some kind of coordination, which does not lay necessarily in the approach of cooperative games, since the term co-operate means that two or more individuals are operating as a unique entity, which is not the case of the problem addressed here, but illustrates quite well the same idea, of individuals autonomously orienting their behaviour toward a mutual benefit solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%