POKLUDA, R., PETŘÍKOVÁ, K., ABDELAZIZ, M. E., JEZDINSKÝ, A.: Eff ect of water stress on selected physiological characteristics of tomatoes. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2010, LVIII, No. 1, pp. 131-138 This work presents the results of a fi eld experiment with tomato cv. Proton grown under water stress conditions and under well irrigated conditions. At the same time, the eff ects of Pentakeep supporting agent (consisting of aminolevulinic acid) was studied. The following characteristics of plant phy siolo gy were studied -specifi c leaf area (SLA), leaf water content (LWC) and leaf proline concentration. . The highly signifi cant eff ect of water conditions resulted in the increase of proline content under water stress treatment. Although Pentakeep increased the proline content by 9 %, its eff ect was not of signifi cant importance. The proline content was also infl uenced by the date of sampling. The results indicate that physiological characteristics, such as SLA, LWC and proline content, are good indicators of water stress in tomato, proline content being a particularly reliable parameter corresponding to the actual water stress of plants.water stress, tomato, specifi c leaf area, leaf water content, proline Droughts in connection with high temperatures have become the most common abiotic factors infl uencing physiological processes in plants, and consequently the yield and its quality. Under water stress, plants naturally try to prevent loss of water by means of various mechanisms, such as pore closing (CHAVES et al., 2003), synthesis of osmoprotectants -sugars, aminoacid proline and other substances (RAMANJULU et al., 2002). It has been found out (CLAUSSEN, 2005) that proline content grows signifi cantly as early as in 14 hours a er water stress. When assessing stress in hydroponically grown tomatoes, it was found out that proline content in tomato leaves under water stress was higher in summer than at the end of the vegetation. The level of proline also depends on light intensity. A negative correlation of proline and leaf water content (LWC) was proved. The relative LWC decrease by 5 % doubled the increase of proline content. SHTEREVA et al. (2008) mention the possibility to use a 'proline' test as an instrument for fi nding tomato genotypes tolerant to water stress.Apart from the natural mechanisms reducing the stress, new possible uses of complementary substances leading to greater stress endurance of plants are being searched for. One such substance is aminolevulinic acid (ALA) which has a number of positive eff ects on plant physiology.According to KORMAZ et al. (2009), spraying or dipping pepper seedlings in ALA solution clearly reduced the signs of cold damage. At the same time, an exogenous application of ALA increased the content of the monitored constituents, including proline. ALA also increased the relative leaf water con-