1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(98)00178-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of water in the low-temperature catalytic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to sulfur over activated carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that water presence enhanced the adsorption of H 2 S. Previous results stated that water is very important in H 2 S removal (Primavera et al, 1998;Bandosz et al, 2000;Yang et al, 1998;Yan et al, 2004;Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008;Klein and Henning, 1984;Mikhalovsky and Zaitsev, 1997). According to Primavera et al (1998), water presence may affect the removal reaction path in two ways: (a) H 2 S dissolution to HS -ions occurs in the water film inside the adsorbent pores; thus, the removal reaction proceeds faster in water than on the catalyst surface; (b) water continuously removes sulfur from the active sites and promotes sulfur adsorption on different carbon sections (Xiao et al, 2008, Primavera et al, 1998, Klein and Henning, 1984). Hydrophilicity of activated carbon is believed to increase in the presence of oxygencontaining functional groups on the carbon surface (Choi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is seen that water presence enhanced the adsorption of H 2 S. Previous results stated that water is very important in H 2 S removal (Primavera et al, 1998;Bandosz et al, 2000;Yang et al, 1998;Yan et al, 2004;Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008;Klein and Henning, 1984;Mikhalovsky and Zaitsev, 1997). According to Primavera et al (1998), water presence may affect the removal reaction path in two ways: (a) H 2 S dissolution to HS -ions occurs in the water film inside the adsorbent pores; thus, the removal reaction proceeds faster in water than on the catalyst surface; (b) water continuously removes sulfur from the active sites and promotes sulfur adsorption on different carbon sections (Xiao et al, 2008, Primavera et al, 1998, Klein and Henning, 1984). Hydrophilicity of activated carbon is believed to increase in the presence of oxygencontaining functional groups on the carbon surface (Choi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Especially for higher relative humidites, water may be adsorbed when these functional groups are present, thus, direct contact of HS -with the carbon surface may be restricted. It was found that an increasing trend in sulfur deposition occurred until 60% relative humidity for activated carbons (Primavera et al, 1998;Le Lauch et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temperature has also been extensively studied [7][8][9]. Given the combination of their unique surface features (high specific surface and pore volume) and surface chemistry (improved by the addition of functional groups or by its metallic content), activated carbon-based materials have been proved to work efficiently as adsorbents of sulphurcontaining species such as H 2 S, SO 2 or methyl mercaptans from the gas phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid sulfur formed by reaction between H 2 S and oxygen on the NiS 2 active particles should very rapidly block the access of the reactants to the active phase, i.e., for low solid sulfur amounts on the catalyst, as usually reported over traditional catalysts. 21,22 A peculiar sulfur deposition mode on the catalyst surface has been advanced, in order to explain why the catalyst could maintain high performances, even when the sulfur loading on the catalyst surface reached 80 wt. %.…”
Section: Selective Oxidation Of H 2 Smentioning
confidence: 99%