2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03879-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of vitamin D on the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 􏽢 X(t) reflects the change trend of the amplitude of human motion acceleration, the posterior value 􏽢 X(t) tends to be constant in a steady state. According to the change of the posterior value 􏽢 X(t) in the filtering process, it is judged whether the state of the human body is [20].…”
Section: Health Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 􏽢 X(t) reflects the change trend of the amplitude of human motion acceleration, the posterior value 􏽢 X(t) tends to be constant in a steady state. According to the change of the posterior value 􏽢 X(t) in the filtering process, it is judged whether the state of the human body is [20].…”
Section: Health Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence and related mortality are conflicting. Vitamin D supplementation (at doses of 400 IU/day to 100,000 IU/4 months, mostly 2000 IU/day) may reduce the incidence (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92) and extend survival in patients with colorectal cancer (proportion of patients with VDD across studies: 13-99%) [101,102].…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample sizes of the studies varied between 1,902 and 1,566,662. Of these meta-analyses, 20 studies [12][13][14]18,21,22,36,37,40,42,[44][45][46][47][48]53,54,57,59,60] reported risk for total cancer and various cancer types, three studies [49,50,52] reported mortality, and 12 studies [19,20,23,24,38,39,41,43,51,55,56,58] reported both mortality and risk. In eight meta-analyses [18,19,20,39,41,56,58,60], the primary studies consisted of RCTs.…”
Section: Baseline Characteristics Of the Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%