2020
DOI: 10.1080/21683603.2020.1802376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of violent video game playing on bullying in low-income urban neighborhoods: A serial mediation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a balanced perspective should be adopted along with the program since normal Internet adolescent's users or adolescents under no VVGE or low-level VVGE categories were negatively associated with school bullying behaviors, which indicated the possible benefits of game playing ( 27 ). Notably, our results among these weak correlations between different sub-types of school bullying and VVGE were also in line with previous studies ( 26 , 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, a balanced perspective should be adopted along with the program since normal Internet adolescent's users or adolescents under no VVGE or low-level VVGE categories were negatively associated with school bullying behaviors, which indicated the possible benefits of game playing ( 27 ). Notably, our results among these weak correlations between different sub-types of school bullying and VVGE were also in line with previous studies ( 26 , 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This technique can obtain essentially identical factor loadings in each parcel. Moreover, AMOS user-defined stands were utilized to determine the particular and complete indirect effect together [ 78 ]. We utilized a bootstrapping investigation to measure the indirect impact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel mediation analysis was done using AMOS 24.0 by creating a user-defined estimands to test the specific indirect effects of both the mediators (Ali et al, 2022). The results of the indirect effects are presented in Table 3.…”
Section: Specific Indirect Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%