2004
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl021112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of vertical measurement resolution on the correlation structure of a ground penetrating radar reflection image

Abstract: [1] Geostatistical analysis of a ground penetrating radar reflection image can be used to quantify the maximum correlation direction and the range of horizontal and subhorizontal radar reflections. A review of previous work, and an analysis of a photograph of layered sediments, suggest that the vertical resolution of a radar image strongly affects its lateral correlation structure. Numerical modeling was used to generate synthetic radar sections and investigate the effect of the vertical resolution of the rada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as in the case of our synthetic example, we see that the higher-frequency data appear to have a shorter lateral correlation length. This is because reflectors which effectively ''line up'' when imaged at 100 MHz become horizontally discontinuous when imaged at 200 MHz, again confirming the dependence on vertical resolution of the horizontal correlation structure of the GPR data [Knight et al, 2004]. This effective decrease in correlation length of the data with increasing frequency is better seen in Figure 9, which shows the calculated 2-D autocorrelations of the 100 and 200 MHz data along with horizontal and vertical slices through the centers of these autocorrelations.…”
Section: Field Data Examplesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, as in the case of our synthetic example, we see that the higher-frequency data appear to have a shorter lateral correlation length. This is because reflectors which effectively ''line up'' when imaged at 100 MHz become horizontally discontinuous when imaged at 200 MHz, again confirming the dependence on vertical resolution of the horizontal correlation structure of the GPR data [Knight et al, 2004]. This effective decrease in correlation length of the data with increasing frequency is better seen in Figure 9, which shows the calculated 2-D autocorrelations of the 100 and 200 MHz data along with horizontal and vertical slices through the centers of these autocorrelations.…”
Section: Field Data Examplesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The interaction of the radar signal with this mixture is affected both by the volumetric ratio of ice to air as well as by the shape and orientation of the ice crystals and air voids. However, Harper and Bradford [2003] show that, for cold snow, the complex refractive index model (CRIM) equation [ Wharton et al , 1980; Knight et al , 2004] can be adapted to closely estimate the bulk density of the mixture based on the velocity of the EM wave propagation. The adapted CRIM equation is ρf=truevavf1truevavi1ρi, where ρ f and ρ i are the densities of firn and ice, respectively, and ν f , ν i , and ν a are the EM propagation velocities of firn, ice, and air, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() observed similarities between the horizontal correlation statistics of GPR reflection data and those of closely spaced neutron‐probe water‐content measurements, but pointed to the results of previous work demonstrating that the lateral correlation structure of a GPR reflection image will be strongly influenced by the vertical measurement resolution, which in turn is controlled by the antenna centre frequency (Knight et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To date, several attempts have been made to relate the lateral correlation statistics of surface‐based reflection GPR data to those of the investigated subsurface region (e.g. Rea and Knight ; Oldenborger, Knoll and Barrash ; Knight, Tercier and Irving ; Dafflon, Tronicke and Holliger ; Knight et al . ; Irving, Knight and Holliger ; Irving and Holliger ; Irving, Scholer and Holliger ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%