2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of variation in phased array element performance for Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the theoretical background of the full hybrid approach in two and three dimensions, the reader is referred to [9] and [10], respectively. To simulate the source domain, we choose to employ a semi-analytical beam model based on the Huygens-Fresnel principle of superposition; previous validation studies have shown it to produce accurate results when modelling a wedge-mounted transduction system [14], which is required here to simulate a shear wave at oblique incidence. The complex displacement amplitude, , at a point, , within the component is given by the equation:…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the theoretical background of the full hybrid approach in two and three dimensions, the reader is referred to [9] and [10], respectively. To simulate the source domain, we choose to employ a semi-analytical beam model based on the Huygens-Fresnel principle of superposition; previous validation studies have shown it to produce accurate results when modelling a wedge-mounted transduction system [14], which is required here to simulate a shear wave at oblique incidence. The complex displacement amplitude, , at a point, , within the component is given by the equation:…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NDT, ultrasonic hardware calibration typically pertains to the efficacy of the array to steer and focus the ultrasonic beam [6], [3]. Therefore, in this context, under-performing hardware exhibit beam artefacts such as increased side-lobe activity, increased main-beam width or reduction in the main-beam energy level [6]. These beam artefacts lead to spurious signals being detected, increasing the uncertainty in the localisation of reflectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These beam artefacts lead to spurious signals being detected, increasing the uncertainty in the localisation of reflectors. As a result, calibration of ultrasonic hardware has typically focused on beam integrity rather than probe integrity [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the FMC data to perform the calibration enables the results to be based purely on the integrity of the hardware, because it decouples error associated with the hardware from that in the beam forming delays [3]. Previously, array calibration has assessed purely the consistency of element performance in terms of the variation between elements [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, array calibration has assessed purely the consistency of element performance in terms of the variation between elements [3]. In this paper, the spread in element performance due to positional error has also been investigated by acquiring multiple FMC replicates of the sample under identical experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%