The effect of urethral catheterization on the level of prostate-specific antigen

Objective: To investigate the value of standard [digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA] and advanced (mpMRI, prostate biopsy) clinical evaluation for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in contemporary patients with clinical bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) scheduled for Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 397 patients, who were referred to our tertiary care laser center for HoLEP due to BOO between 11/2017 and 07/2020. Of those, 83 (20.7%) underwent further advanced clinical PCa evaluation with mpMRI and/or prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA and/or lowered PSA ratio and/or suspicious DRE. Logistic regression and binary regression tree models were applied to identify PCa in BOO patients.Results: An mpMRI was conducted in 56 (66%) of 83 patients and revealed PIRADS 4/5 lesions in 14 (25%) patients. Subsequently, a combined systematic randomized and MRI-fusion biopsy was performed in 19 (23%) patients and revealed in PCa detection in four patients (5%). A randomized prostate biopsy was performed in 31 (37%) patients and revealed in PCa detection in three patients (4%). All seven patients (9%) with PCa detection underwent radical prostatectomy with 29% exhibiting non-organ confined disease. Incidental PCa after HoLEP (n = 76) was found in nine patients (12%) with advanced clinical PCa evaluation preoperatively. In univariable logistic regression analyses, PSA, fPSA ratio, and PSA density failed to identify patients with PCa detection. Conversely, patients with a lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and PIRADs 4/5 lesion in mpMRI were at higher risk for PCa detection. In multivariable adjusted analyses, PIRADS 4/5 lesions were confirmed as an independent risk factor (OR 9.91, p = 0.04), while IPSS did not reach significance (p = 0.052).Conclusion: In advanced clinical PCa evaluation mpMRI should be considered in patients with elevated total PSA or low fPSA ratio scheduled for BOO treatment with HoLEP. Patients with low IPSS or PIRADS 4/5 lesions in mpMRI are at highest risk for PCa detection. In patients with a history of two or more sets of negative prostate biopsies, advanced clinical PCa evaluation might be omitted.

show abstract

Is the Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Affected by Urethral Catheterization in Patients with Acute Urinary Retention?

Shahrokhi Damavand,

Akhavan Tavakoli,

Esmaeili

et al. 2024

Nephro-Urol Mon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The reason for elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients undergoing urethral catheterization due to acute urinary retention (AUR) remains a significant and controversial issue. Objectives: To assess the serum PSA level in men with AUR and its changes after catheterization. Methods: This prospective quasi-experimental study (reviewer 1 - comment 7) was conducted on 43 patients who underwent transurethral catheterization following AUR caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Total PSA levels and free/total PSA ratios were measured before catheterization and one and three days after catheter insertion. Additionally, prostate volume and urine output after catheterization (UOAC) were recorded. Results: The mean age, prostate volume, and UOAC of the patients were 69.05 ± 9.45 years, 60.51 ± 26.35 g, and 844.04 ± 341.66 mL, respectively. The mean and median baseline total PSA levels were 12.59 ± 17.71 ng/mL and 6.30 ng/mL, respectively. These values changed to 13.73 ± 19.83 ng/mL (median = 4.80 ng/mL) and 11.57 ± 17.70 ng/mL (median = 4.40 ng/mL) after 1 and 3 days of catheterization, respectively. The changes in total PSA and free/total PSA levels during the study period were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, the PSA levels showed no statistically significant difference before, 1 day, and 3 days after catheterization in groups with total PSA ≤ 4 and total PSA > 4 (P = 0.37; 0.22, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest an initial elevation in PSA levels in patients with AUR before urethral catheterization. Both PSA and free/total PSA ratios showed no statistically significant differences before and after urethral catheter insertion, and initial PSA levels did not affect their changes post-catheterization (reviewer 1 - comment 1).

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

The effect of urethral catheterization on the level of prostate-specific antigen

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

COVID-19’s effects on symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

COVID-19’s effects on symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Multiparametric MRI may Help to Identify Patients With Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Clinical Bladder Outlet Obstruction Scheduled for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP)

Is the Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Affected by Urethral Catheterization in Patients with Acute Urinary Retention?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About