2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of unresolved transition arrays on plasma opacity calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That these different EoS models give results which only differ on the 5% level gives confidence that the uncertainty in the EoS is not large enough to compromise the experiments. However, more work is needed to better understand the equation of state differences between codes and further work is underway using the OPENSESAME suite and particle swarm fitting methods [26,27] for a range of equation of state calculations and measurements.…”
Section: Predicted Results and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That these different EoS models give results which only differ on the 5% level gives confidence that the uncertainty in the EoS is not large enough to compromise the experiments. However, more work is needed to better understand the equation of state differences between codes and further work is underway using the OPENSESAME suite and particle swarm fitting methods [26,27] for a range of equation of state calculations and measurements.…”
Section: Predicted Results and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a one-electron jump from an orbital (n ) gives rise to a transition array which can be detailed or not. In order to decide whether a line-by-line calculation is necessary and to determine the validity of statistical methods, it can be interesting to quantify the porosity (localized absence of lines) of transition arrays [38,39]. In SCO-RCG, the most limiting parameter is the maximum number of lines per transition array allowed by the user.…”
Section: Previous Approach Used In Sco-rcgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the peak absorption cross section without considering the AI resonance broadening is just 2.43 times larger than that which includes this effect. This is due to many lines overlapped together resulting in less pronounced for the effect of AI resonance broadening than in 14 …”
Section: Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of computational ability, computation of plasma opacities is developing toward more accurate direction including DLA, mixed DLA and UTA and improvement of UTA [12][13][14]. In this work, we investigated the radiative opacity of Ge plasmas by using a detailed level accounting (DLA) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%