1964
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0290111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Undernutrition and Rehabilitation on the Development of the Reproductive Organs: Pigs

Abstract: 1) During prolonged undernutrition in pigs from 2 to 3 weeks of age: (a) the tubules of the testes developed but the interstitial cells regressed and became unrecognizable; (b) the glans penis became large and oedematous; (c) the primordial follicles in the ovaries developed and some became large and cystic but ovulation did not follow; (d) the uterus and vulva enlarged.(2) During rapid rehabilitation: (a) The vulva and testicles became much enlarged relative to the rest of the body; (b) the glans penis develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a requirement may be the explanation for the well documented observation that the greater the degree of food restriction in poultry (and hence the lower the body weight at the end of the restriction period), the longer the delay in egg production when food restriction ceases (Lee et al, 1971). Data which can be interpreted similarly have been reported for cattle (Crichton et al, 1959), pig (Dickerson et al, 1964), rat (Kennedy and Mitra, 1963) and human (Frisch and Revelle, 1970).…”
Section: Body Weight and Sexual Maturitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Such a requirement may be the explanation for the well documented observation that the greater the degree of food restriction in poultry (and hence the lower the body weight at the end of the restriction period), the longer the delay in egg production when food restriction ceases (Lee et al, 1971). Data which can be interpreted similarly have been reported for cattle (Crichton et al, 1959), pig (Dickerson et al, 1964), rat (Kennedy and Mitra, 1963) and human (Frisch and Revelle, 1970).…”
Section: Body Weight and Sexual Maturitymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Undernutrition may produce a distortion of the normal growth pattern, with some parts of the body having priority of growth over others, and with some body functions appearing only after the attainment of a certain size. In pigs this is true for the production of luteinising hormone (Dickerson et al, 1964), and in chickens, too, the secretion of this hormone, which is essential for ovulation, may be linked with the attainment of a particular size (Buonomo et al, 1982). It should be emphasised, however, that no proof has been offered in this study that body weight is a causal factor rather than only a correlate of the start of lay, nor has the mechanism been determined by which weight influences or initiates the onset of egg production.…”
Section: Body Weight At First Eggmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervix weight and length increased (P < 0.01) to a lesser extent ( x 1.4 and x 1.2, respectively) after puberty. (Joshi and Raeside, 1973 ;Morat et al 1980 ;Booth, 1980Booth, , 1983Lauwers et al, 1981) and undernutrition is known to reduce androgen production (Dickerson et al, 1964 ;Bonneau, 1987 (1983). However, the growth performances in the study of Den Hartog and Noordewier (1984) were similar to ours, while in that of Etienne et al (1983) gilts fed ad libitum had a slower growth rate so that they were one month older at 125 kg of live weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%