2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-008-9238-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Undercooling on Solidification of YSZ Splats

Abstract: We consider the rapid solidification of a molten YSZ particle, by solving the so-called hyperbolic equations for heat and mass transfer. The hyperbolic model predicts the interface undercooling (due to thermal and solutal effects) and velocity as a function of time, as well as the yttria redistribution within the solid phase. Results are then compared to corresponding ones that we obtained from a parabolic model, to assess the extent to which YSZ solidification is influenced by nonequilibrium effects. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical properties of YSZ [15] used for the simulations are given in Table 2. Results were calculated for a 10 lm thick splat, admittedly thicker than the splat of Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The physical properties of YSZ [15] used for the simulations are given in Table 2. Results were calculated for a 10 lm thick splat, admittedly thicker than the splat of Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the splat/ substrate interface, we prescribed a value of the heat transfer coefficient in the range h ¼ 5:0 Â 10 5 to 1:0 Â 10 7 Wm À2 K À1 , that is usually associated with thermal spray splat solidification. The equilibrium melting temperature of YSZ is 2950 K [15]; we specified an initial undercooling of either 150 or 700 K, leading to the onset of grain growth when the temperature at the splat/substrate interface initially reached 2800 or 2250 K, respectively. The 150 K undercooling was also specified by Wang [11]; the 700 K undercooling comes from Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations