2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ea000164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of two types of El Niño on the southerly low‐level jets in North America

Abstract: Low-level jets (LLJs) are frequent weather phenomena in many regions of North America and have profound impacts on precipitation and wind energy. We used a 31 year three-hourly reanalysis data set to examine the teleconnection between southerly LLJ activity in North America and the two dominant patterns of the equatorial Pacific Ocean sea surface temperature anomalies characterized by El Niño and El Niño Modoki. We show that El Niño and El Niño Modoki exert different effects on the jet activities, and the res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2017) found a difference between precipitation in Mexico between El Niño and La Niña years which depended on seasonality, considered to be due to a southwards shift in the sub‐tropical jet (STJ; Magaña et al ., 2003). The influence of ENSO on the location of STJ is also important in determining whether weather systems from the North propagate into Mexico (Yu et al ., 2016). Some authors have also noted differences in surface wind patterns with ENSO (e.g., Vega et al ., 1998; Maldonado et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017) found a difference between precipitation in Mexico between El Niño and La Niña years which depended on seasonality, considered to be due to a southwards shift in the sub‐tropical jet (STJ; Magaña et al ., 2003). The influence of ENSO on the location of STJ is also important in determining whether weather systems from the North propagate into Mexico (Yu et al ., 2016). Some authors have also noted differences in surface wind patterns with ENSO (e.g., Vega et al ., 1998; Maldonado et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, monthly predictions of mid to late-summer circulation are heavily influenced by SST anomaly conditions. Opposite SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific and North Atlantic often result in low-level circulation patterns that favor Great Plains LLJ strengthening (Hu and Feng 2012;Patricola et al 2015;Weaver et al 2009b;Weaver 2013;Weaver et al 2016;Yu et al 2017). Spring LLJs have been linked to the cool phase of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), whereas the summer LLJ has been linked to the warm phase (Danco and Martin 2018;Krishnamurthy et al 2015;Ting and Wang 1997;Trenberth and Guillemot 1996;Yu et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opposite SST anomalies in the tropical Pacific and North Atlantic often result in low-level circulation patterns that favor Great Plains LLJ strengthening (Hu and Feng 2012;Patricola et al 2015;Weaver et al 2009b;Weaver 2013;Weaver et al 2016;Yu et al 2017). Spring LLJs have been linked to the cool phase of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), whereas the summer LLJ has been linked to the warm phase (Danco and Martin 2018;Krishnamurthy et al 2015;Ting and Wang 1997;Trenberth and Guillemot 1996;Yu et al 2016). ENSO state influences a circulation response, but the moisture supply for the extreme events originates in the subtropical Atlantic (Li et al 2016;Li et al 2017;Veres and Hu 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On seasonal time-scales, Bravo-Cabrera et al (2017) found a difference between precipitation in Mexico between El Niño and La Niña years which depended on seasonality, considered to be due to a southwards shift in the sub-tropical jet (STJ; Magaña et al, 2003). The influence of ENSO on the location of STJ is also important in determining whether weather systems from the North propagate into Mexico (Yu et al, 2016). Some authors have also noted differences in surface wind patterns with ENSO (e.g., Vega et al, 1998;Maldonado et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%