1988
DOI: 10.1080/01449298808901862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of tree structure on search in a hierarchical menu selection system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The control group received mild instructions to avoid rushing ("Take your time; there is no rush"). Norman and Chin (1988) fixed the number of levels at four, with 256 target items, and varied the shape of the tree structures. They recommend greater breadth at the root and at the leaves, and added a further encouragement to minimize the total number of menu frames needed so as to increase familiarity.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group received mild instructions to avoid rushing ("Take your time; there is no rush"). Norman and Chin (1988) fixed the number of levels at four, with 256 target items, and varied the shape of the tree structures. They recommend greater breadth at the root and at the leaves, and added a further encouragement to minimize the total number of menu frames needed so as to increase familiarity.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group received mild instructions to avoid rushing (`take your time; there is no rush'). Norman and Chin (1988) ®xed the number of levels at four, with 256 target items, and varied the shape of the tree structures. They recommend greater breadth at the root and at the leaves, and added a further encouragement to minimize the total number of menu frames needed so as to increase familiarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons that limit the parameters of menu designs to depth and breadth may not account for some factors that affect performance. Studies of menu structures with different shapes (Norman & Chin, 1988) and with differing amounts of contextual information (Chimera & Shneiderman, 1994;Zaphiris, Shneiderman, & Norman, 1999) have shown that performance can be influenced by the type of task, the amount of context given, and the shape of the menu. Examination of these issues as they apply to simultaneous menus is a promising direction for future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alphabetical versus categorical ordering within categorized groups did not affect performance. Norman and Chin (1988) examined the effect of menu structure shape. Using a 256-item menu structure and a constant depth of four, they compared structures with a range of items at each level, including constant (4 × 4 × 4 × 4), decreasing (8 × 8 × 2 × 2), increasing (2 × 2 × 8 × 8), concave (8 × 2 × 2 × 8), and convex (2 × 8 × 8 × 2).…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%