2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Treatment Sequence on Overall Survival for Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, this study was limited by its retrospective design that might have caused selection bias. Secondly, with being devoid of clinical records to define the treatment failure, we could not analyze the treatment outcomes from the second-line treatment, especially in comparing survival outcomes according to sequential therapy [39,40]. Thirdly, the dosage/adherence of the treatment, e.g., relative dose intensity, in individuals was not considered in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, this study was limited by its retrospective design that might have caused selection bias. Secondly, with being devoid of clinical records to define the treatment failure, we could not analyze the treatment outcomes from the second-line treatment, especially in comparing survival outcomes according to sequential therapy [39,40]. Thirdly, the dosage/adherence of the treatment, e.g., relative dose intensity, in individuals was not considered in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the study was limited by its retrospective design, which might have caused selection bias. Secondly, due to the lack of treatment records to define treatment failure, we were unable to further analyse treatment outcomes after second‐line treatment, in particular by a comparison of survival outcome according to sequential therapy [25,26]. Thirdly, we were unable to consider biological markers for treatment outcomes, including ARV7 [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test has greatly improved the diagnosis and treatment of PC (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). However, PSA has become associated with the overdiagnosis of patients with the non-aggressive disease and displays limited usefulness in patients with castrationresistant PC (5,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). Therefore, there is an unmet need for novel diagnostic (detection of early-stage disease, and differentiation of benign from malignant disease), prognostic (prediction of disease outcome and monitoring of disease recurrence), and predictive (monitoring of the response to therapeutics and aiding treatment decisions) biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%