2007
DOI: 10.4005/jjfs.89.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Treatment for Land Surface during Forest Practice on Soil Nitrogen Dynamics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sasa litterfall accounted for 30% of the total litterfall in a natural forest, and that the litter decomposed more slowly than tree leaf litter because of its high silicate content [ 26 ]. It has also been reported that Sasa mitigates increases of soil inorganic N [ 27 , 28 , 29 ] and N leaching from soil to streams [ 30 , 31 ] because of the rapid annual increment of its aboveground and belowground biomass. These results indicate that Sasa take up the most of increased soil inorganic N after disturbances such as atmospheric N deposition or forest management treatments, suggesting that the change of soil N fertility influence on Sasa litter dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sasa litterfall accounted for 30% of the total litterfall in a natural forest, and that the litter decomposed more slowly than tree leaf litter because of its high silicate content [ 26 ]. It has also been reported that Sasa mitigates increases of soil inorganic N [ 27 , 28 , 29 ] and N leaching from soil to streams [ 30 , 31 ] because of the rapid annual increment of its aboveground and belowground biomass. These results indicate that Sasa take up the most of increased soil inorganic N after disturbances such as atmospheric N deposition or forest management treatments, suggesting that the change of soil N fertility influence on Sasa litter dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munson and Timmer 1995). Regarding nutrient uptake by growing plants (Archibold et al 2000;Shibata et al 2007), the difference in soil nitrogen content in the earlier growing seasons might be greater. As well, these sites should have a similar seed supply because of the similar distances to a surrounding mature stand (ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The rapid vegetation recovery would also contribute to reducing the risk of outflows of sediments and nutrients (Ahtiainen 1992). Although scarification generally increases soil microbial activity owing both to reducing nutrient uptake by plants and increasing soil temperature, the lack of soil carbon decreases the immobilization of nitrogen (Shibata et al 2007). The supply of abundant organic carbon by the soil replacement treatment, therefore, should reduce the nitrogen leaching after replacement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, nitrate leaching induced by forest management has been reported in a north Japanese forest with removal of surface soil and understory vegetation by scarification (Ozawa et al 2001;Shibata et al 2007), which is a treatment to promote regeneration of forests with avoidance of dominance of a single understory plant (Sasa senanensis). Nitrification and nitrate concentrations in soil water increased in the site with scarification, and were leached out in early spring by snow melt.…”
Section: Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%