Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of transport on quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the control group, the number of compressions per simulation was 1266.60, but the percentage of chest compressions that achieved adequate depth was only 50% (Table II). This low percentage confirms present speculations that the quality of chest compressions is relatively substandard during transport, (13) and that the survival rates of patients with cardiac arrest who are given CPR while transported to a hospital remain poor. (14,15) In the experimental group, the number of This experiment simulated real-life CPR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the control group, the number of compressions per simulation was 1266.60, but the percentage of chest compressions that achieved adequate depth was only 50% (Table II). This low percentage confirms present speculations that the quality of chest compressions is relatively substandard during transport, (13) and that the survival rates of patients with cardiac arrest who are given CPR while transported to a hospital remain poor. (14,15) In the experimental group, the number of This experiment simulated real-life CPR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2 Despite the evidence of survival benefit with optimal CPR delivery, CPR quality in both in-hospital and out-of-hospital remains poor. [3][4][5] Many studies have documented poor retention of CPR skills after standard courses. [6][7][8][9][10] Based on the results of their systematic review, Mancini et al suggest that CPR skill decay occurs as rapidly as 3 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent large multi-centre RCTs with the LUCAS- [91 && ] and AutoPulse [92 && ] mechanical chest compression device, have both shown similar survival compared with manual CPR. Obviously, mechanical CPR is the preferred CPR method during transport [93,94]. There are no data to support the use of any of the available mechanical chest compression devices over another.…”
Section: Ultrasound Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%