1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0737-0806(07)80397-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of toe angle on tendon, ligament and hoof wall strains in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have reported a change in distribution of forces on the hoof wall, with changes in hoof angles insinuating increased stress on the dorsal hoof wall with a lower angle, but did not include data documenting decreased strain [42,51]. Although many of the models are derived from ex vivo measurements [42,49,51], findings from these studies suggest, at least in part, that hoof shape and size may play a role in laminar function and failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have reported a change in distribution of forces on the hoof wall, with changes in hoof angles insinuating increased stress on the dorsal hoof wall with a lower angle, but did not include data documenting decreased strain [42,51]. Although many of the models are derived from ex vivo measurements [42,49,51], findings from these studies suggest, at least in part, that hoof shape and size may play a role in laminar function and failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Varying hoof angles may also produce areas of greater hoof wall strain, thereby increasing the likelihood of laminar failure. However, conflicting results concerning dorsal laminar hoof wall strain have been reported, with some studies reporting decreased strain with increasing hoof angle through wedging of the heel [47,48], whereas other studies have found no difference in dorsal laminar hoof wall strain [49] or weightbearing in the toe region following application of a heel wedge [50]. Other studies have reported a change in distribution of forces on the hoof wall, with changes in hoof angles insinuating increased stress on the dorsal hoof wall with a lower angle, but did not include data documenting decreased strain [42,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second effect of the Huskamp cast, in addition to load transfer to the palmar hoof structures, is a decrease in the pull of the DDFT caused by heel elevation. Forces of the DDFT are dependent on the distal interphalangeal (coffin) joint angle and can be significantly reduced by heel wedges 10,13,26 . Similar to the hoof cast, shoes with 10–18° wedges 9 or clogs with wedges (Dallmer, Salzhausen‐Putensen, Germany) are used to achieve this reduction in pull of the DDFT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 This decreases the flexion moment provided by the DDFT reducing the pull of the DDFT and decreasing tensile stress in the dorsal lamellae. 7,9,13 A hoof cast described by Huskamp 14 combined heel elevation with support of the frog, bar, and crus of the sole. The hoof cast has a palmar wedge ( Fig 1A) that shifts the point of the force applied to the quarter and frog slightly palmar of the DIP rotation center with the intent of relieving the dorsal wall and reducing tensile forces from the DDFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%