1995
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00194-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of tip radius on nano-indentation hardness tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A valley of 20 nm depth was observed. Lu and Bogy [15] have reported through finite element analyses that aluminum shows higher pile-up and less elastic recovery than silicon. As previously mentioned, the microstructure of semi-solid processed Al-Si alloy usually consists of a ␣-Al globular structure and Al/Si eutectic phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A valley of 20 nm depth was observed. Lu and Bogy [15] have reported through finite element analyses that aluminum shows higher pile-up and less elastic recovery than silicon. As previously mentioned, the microstructure of semi-solid processed Al-Si alloy usually consists of a ␣-Al globular structure and Al/Si eutectic phases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Voigt and Reuss averages are ν = 0.218 and ν = 0.228, respectively (Hull, 1999). However, often values around ν = 0.275 are cited (Brantley, 1973;Hess, 1996;Lu and Bogy, 1995;Youn and Kang, 2005;Yan et al, 2001) and successfully used. Wortman and Evans (1965) noted that the Poisson's ratio varies over a large range of values depending on the crystal orientation with bounds given by 0.048 < ν < 0.403.…”
Section: Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This difference could be because the indenter tip is not perfectly spherical in the experiments. Indeed, the shape of the indenter can make a significant difference [34][35][36] because the contact area evolution, as the indentation proceeds, will depend on the indenter shape. Another possible explanation for this discrepancy is the role played by pre-existing defects in the experimental film.…”
Section: Effects Of the Indenter Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%