2020
DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2020.1723689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of tilt angle on solar still productivity at different seasons in arid conditions (south Algeria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years extensive research has been carried out in an attempt to enhance the productivity of these devices. Several inventive methods, such as utilizing different absorber materials (Arunkumar et al, 2018, including thermal energy storage Hasan, 2019, Sakthivel andArjunan, 2019), varying the cover tilt angle (Cherraye et al 2020. Azooz and Younis, 2016, Dev and Tiwari, 2009, adding external condensers (Hassan et al 2020, Al-Hamadani andShukla, 2013), adding features to increase the absorption area El-Sabaii andEl-Naggar, 2017, El-Sabaii et al, 2015), using fins within the enclosure (Subhani andKumar, 2019, El-Sabaii et al, 2000) and using mirrors to increase the incident radiation (Karimi Estahbanati et al, 2016, Tanaka, 2009 have all been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years extensive research has been carried out in an attempt to enhance the productivity of these devices. Several inventive methods, such as utilizing different absorber materials (Arunkumar et al, 2018, including thermal energy storage Hasan, 2019, Sakthivel andArjunan, 2019), varying the cover tilt angle (Cherraye et al 2020. Azooz and Younis, 2016, Dev and Tiwari, 2009, adding external condensers (Hassan et al 2020, Al-Hamadani andShukla, 2013), adding features to increase the absorption area El-Sabaii andEl-Naggar, 2017, El-Sabaii et al, 2015), using fins within the enclosure (Subhani andKumar, 2019, El-Sabaii et al, 2000) and using mirrors to increase the incident radiation (Karimi Estahbanati et al, 2016, Tanaka, 2009 have all been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have tried to adjust the glazing angle to maximize pure water production; they have found that the best angles vary between 20°and 30°. The best glazing angle was 30°with an output of 3517 kg/m 2 in the autumn season and 3633 kg/m 2 in the winter; the best inclination was 20°with a yield of 5224 kg/m 2 in the spring season and 4527 kg/m 2 in the summer season [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gawande et al [30] studied on the shape of absorber surface and performance of the stepped type solar still by utilizing convex, concave absorber instead of flat absorber and indicated increase in the productivity of 57⁒ and 29⁒, respectively. The effect of tilt angle on the productivity of a solar still was experimentally studied by Cherraye et al [31]. The experiments were performed in arid climate of Ouargala city, Algeria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%