2015
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Three Times a Week Glatiramer Acetate on Cerebral T1 Hypointense Lesions in Relapsing‐Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSETwo definitions of T1 hypointense (T1H) lesions can be derived from pre‐contrast images: those that may or may not have a corresponding gadolinium‐enhancing correlate on post‐contrast images (T1H total), and those that are simultaneously non‐gadolinium‐enhancing on post‐contrast scans (T1H non‐enhancing). To determine the differences in lesion evolution between these two T1H definitions, we examined the effect of glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL three times weekly subcutaneous injection (GA40)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, a placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial showed that the percentage of new cerebral lesions evolving into chronic T1 hypointensities was lower in GA-treated vs. placebo-treated RRMS patients [ 18 ]. Such a treatment effect of GA has been confirmed in subsequent studies of different patient populations [ 31 , 32 ]. In the present study, when comparing the change in zT1/T2 between groups, a significant difference was found favoring GA treatment vs. no treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, a placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial showed that the percentage of new cerebral lesions evolving into chronic T1 hypointensities was lower in GA-treated vs. placebo-treated RRMS patients [ 18 ]. Such a treatment effect of GA has been confirmed in subsequent studies of different patient populations [ 31 , 32 ]. In the present study, when comparing the change in zT1/T2 between groups, a significant difference was found favoring GA treatment vs. no treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The rationale for this study design was the desire to assess the potential advantages of a less frequently administered (GA40) versus a more frequently administered formulation (GA20). The question of relatively efficacy between the GA40 and GA20 formulations has been evaluated in previous trials designed for that purpose (Khan et al, 2013;Zivadinov et al, 2018Zivadinov et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%