Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1080/03067311003782625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the wind velocity on the uptake rates of various diffusive samplers

Abstract: This paper examines the results of experiments carried out in an exposure chamber to determine the wind effects on the performance of various diffusive sampler types commonly used for measuring gaseous pollutants in air. The resistance to wind of six diffusive samplers, two Palmes tubes, a badge with diffusion membrane, the EMD sampler and two radial diffusive samplers for different pollutants was compared in a range of velocities from 0 to 300 cm s À1 . For all diffusive samplers tested, an increase in uptake… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variability of sampling rate of passive air sampler for Hg ous investigators, using the white Radiello ® (without protective shield) to monitor varying atmospheric contaminants, fitted logarithmic (Pennequin-Cardinal et al, 2005;Plaisance, 2011;Skov et al, 2007) or quadratic (Plaisance et al, 2004) relationships to data describing the effect of wind speed on SR. The SR was most sensitive at lower wind speed (typically < 1 m s −1 ).…”
Section: S Mclagan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability of sampling rate of passive air sampler for Hg ous investigators, using the white Radiello ® (without protective shield) to monitor varying atmospheric contaminants, fitted logarithmic (Pennequin-Cardinal et al, 2005;Plaisance, 2011;Skov et al, 2007) or quadratic (Plaisance et al, 2004) relationships to data describing the effect of wind speed on SR. The SR was most sensitive at lower wind speed (typically < 1 m s −1 ).…”
Section: S Mclagan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not discussed by Plaisance [36], Figure A1 shows a rapid increase in uptake rate for the Palmes PDT at the lowest wind speeds tested. The paper reports that the controlled chamber conditions gave an uptake rate for the standard Palmes PDT of 1.39 ± 0.07 cm 3 min −1 (equivalent to 8.34 × 10 −5 m 3 h −1 ) for 24 h for conditions of 40-50% RH, 20 • C, wind velocity of 0.50 m s −1 and NO 2 concentration of 200 µg m −3 .…”
Section: Chamber Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Plaisance [36] also used an exposure chamber to determine the effects of wind speed in the range 0 to 3.0 m s −1 on uptake by six diffusive samplers: a Palmes tube, a PASSAM tube (www.passam.ch), a badge with diffusion membrane, the EMD sampler (Ecole des Mines, Douai, France) and two radial diffusive samplers. Sensitivity to temperature and RH was not investigated.…”
Section: Chamber Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature already reports works focused on meteorological conditions and sampling time influence [27,40,43] but rarely on short sampling duration (mainly on days), concerning this compounds (mainly on BTEX) of interest and on a large range of air velocities. This work is the only study which focuses on over 3m.s -1 air velocity effects, whereas local wind velocity can frequently reach such a value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%