2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the tuberculin test and the consequences of a delay in blood culture on the sensitivity of a gamma-interferon assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to this finding, Gormley et al [12] found that the delay in blood culture decreased sensitivity of assay and similar result was reported by Schiller et al [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to this finding, Gormley et al [12] found that the delay in blood culture decreased sensitivity of assay and similar result was reported by Schiller et al [8].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The outbreaks of this disease have been a major cause of economic losses to livestock industries worldwide [10]. The inactive FMD vaccines are widely [7,8,11,12]. Schiller et al [8] reported that the time and temperature of culture will affect the result of assay, and the stimulation temperature needs to be 33 °C or higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, we observed a significant (P ϭ 0.03) improvement in specificity in blood stored overnight (from 85% to 97%) with this sample set. We next determined whether the reduced sensitivity resulting from overnight storage was more evident in diseased cattle that were skin test negative, as had been suggested previously (7). For this study, we performed receiver operator comparison (ROC) analyses using samples from tuberculous animals that tested skin test positive or negative as well as disease-free animals ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well documented that both diagnostic techniques are only partially successful in distinguishing infected cattle from healthy, uninfected animals, with reported sensitivities ranging from 68 to 95% for the skin test (25). Several factors also affect the sensitivity of the IFN-␥ test; these factors may include the proximity of blood sampling to the time of skin test and the time between blood sampling and assay setup (11,30,31). However, major factors underlying the lack of sensitivity of both diagnostic tests is prior exposure of cattle to other mycobacteria present within the environment that share common antigens with M. bovis and nonspecific responses possibly due to NK cells in young animals (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%