1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02802739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the time of sampling on the compliance of bathing water in NW England with the EU Directive on bathing water quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides sampling frequency, sample collection time can dramatically influence the concentration of indicator bacteria detected (Boehm et al, 2002) and hence different sample collection times could result in different management decisions (Enns et al, 2012). Boehm et al (2002) and Kwasi et al (1999) recommended that ideally samples should be collected in the early morning before sunlight has had a chance to reduce FIB concentrations. However, it is important to note that those studies sampled surface waters at beaches that are exposed to sunlight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides sampling frequency, sample collection time can dramatically influence the concentration of indicator bacteria detected (Boehm et al, 2002) and hence different sample collection times could result in different management decisions (Enns et al, 2012). Boehm et al (2002) and Kwasi et al (1999) recommended that ideally samples should be collected in the early morning before sunlight has had a chance to reduce FIB concentrations. However, it is important to note that those studies sampled surface waters at beaches that are exposed to sunlight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%