The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.3390/ani11061525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Size of the Litter in Which the Sow Was Born on Her Lifetime Productivity

Abstract: Improvement of lowly heritable traits is difficult, efforts must be made to take full advantage of the available information sources to improve them. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of the size of the litter in which the sow was born on her lifetime reproductive performance. Data on 22,683 litters were used to analyse the lifetime reproductive performance of 5623 Polish Large White sows. The sows from small litters (≤9) were on average the oldest at first farrowing, had the shortest herd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They would both be understood as two different measures of the same reproductive longevity concept under a common IBP, therefore, not being exactly the same, as the low line had in addition a significant 21% lower IBP (Table 2). Both show interesting findings for animal production: in pigs, a sow's production persistency and fertility in successive parities should be analyzed separately but both improved since the key to increase the overall herd efficiency is to increase both the length of the sow's herd productive life and the number of piglets reared per litter (Warda et al., 2021). This was reinforced by the significantly higher probability of the low line to experiment a new parturition according to the longevity analysis (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They would both be understood as two different measures of the same reproductive longevity concept under a common IBP, therefore, not being exactly the same, as the low line had in addition a significant 21% lower IBP (Table 2). Both show interesting findings for animal production: in pigs, a sow's production persistency and fertility in successive parities should be analyzed separately but both improved since the key to increase the overall herd efficiency is to increase both the length of the sow's herd productive life and the number of piglets reared per litter (Warda et al., 2021). This was reinforced by the significantly higher probability of the low line to experiment a new parturition according to the longevity analysis (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lamb survival and ewe longevity would be improved by implementing genetic selection programmes in addition to the improvement of management practices (Hossein‐Zadeh et al., 2018). Fertility and longevity are traits of economic and welfare importance in livestock species (Martínez‐Paredes et al., 2018) and particularly for prolific animals like rabbits (Penadés et al., 2020) and pigs (Warda et al., 2021). Factors that affect the survival and fitness of females are of great interest to develop strategies (for breeding, nutrition, genetics, etc) that ensure compliance with the specific values of these traits and reduce the risk of females being eliminated from the herd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, breeding goals related to GL must be defined within the framework of production goals specific to an operation. Similarly, past research on number born alive (NBA) provides mixed results, with certain studies suggesting gilts raised in larger litters endure lasting negative environmental effects while other studies show that females from small litters of origin were culled earliest and produced small litters [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Moreover, preweaning mortality may result from negative maternal behaviors such as impartiality to piglet distress calls, method of laying down, and savaging, negatively impacting total number weaned (NW) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%