2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2003.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the size of the training set and number of principal components on the false alarm rate in statistical process monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this distribution of scores and residuals is better comparable with those found by projection of a new independent batch. A more detailed description of this procedure and illustration of this problem can be found in R amaker et al. (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this distribution of scores and residuals is better comparable with those found by projection of a new independent batch. A more detailed description of this procedure and illustration of this problem can be found in R amaker et al. (2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Badcock et al 138 proposed two alternative projection techniques that focus on the temporal structure of multivariate data. Ramaker et al 139 , using simulation, studied the effect of the size of the training set and number of principal components on the false-alarm rate in statistical process monitoring.…”
Section: Pca and Autocorrelated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification step consists in determining the number of PCs that have to be retained in the model. An incorrect identification of the number of significant PCs can cause further problems to the profile monitoring approach that rely on PCA results 18 . In this paper we will use a cross-validation approach to identify the significant PCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%