1963
DOI: 10.1017/s0022029900011389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the replacement of concentrates by roots on the intake and production of dairy cows

Abstract: SummaryTo investigate the effect of replacing part of the concentrates by roots, a 16-week winter-feeding experiment was made using twelve Ayrshire cows. All the cows received 8 lb of hay per day and enough grass silage for a measurable residue to be left at each feed. Two rations were supplemented with 45 lb of fodder-beet per day but the other two contained no roots. At each level of root feeding, concentrates were fed at either 3·50 or 1·75 lb per 10 lb of milk.All the fodder-beet was eaten (8·4 lb dry matt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
6
2
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
6
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The milk yield response to concentrate supplementation was considerable across all levels of concentrate, with the linear response being equivalent to 0·92 kg milk kg −1 concentrate DM. However, although positive milk yield responses to the inclusion of fodder beet were observed in a number of early studies (Castle et al ., 1961; 1963), and indeed more recently (Phipps et al ., 1995), milk yield was unaffected by the inclusion of fodder beet in the current study, in common with the results of a series of studies undertaken in Scotland (Roberts, 1987; Sabri and Roberts, 1988; Fisher et al ., 1994). Although the lack of a yield response, despite a large increase in ME intake, is surprising, the trend towards a higher milk yield, combined with the higher milk energy contents associated with rations containing fodder beet, resulted in a small but significant increase ( P < 0·01) in milk energy output (77·8 vs. 81·3 MJ d −1 , across all concentrate levels).…”
Section: Milk Outputmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The milk yield response to concentrate supplementation was considerable across all levels of concentrate, with the linear response being equivalent to 0·92 kg milk kg −1 concentrate DM. However, although positive milk yield responses to the inclusion of fodder beet were observed in a number of early studies (Castle et al ., 1961; 1963), and indeed more recently (Phipps et al ., 1995), milk yield was unaffected by the inclusion of fodder beet in the current study, in common with the results of a series of studies undertaken in Scotland (Roberts, 1987; Sabri and Roberts, 1988; Fisher et al ., 1994). Although the lack of a yield response, despite a large increase in ME intake, is surprising, the trend towards a higher milk yield, combined with the higher milk energy contents associated with rations containing fodder beet, resulted in a small but significant increase ( P < 0·01) in milk energy output (77·8 vs. 81·3 MJ d −1 , across all concentrate levels).…”
Section: Milk Outputmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In agreement with the findings of many other studies (Castle et al ., 1961; 1963; Sabri and Roberts, 1988; Fisher et al ., 1994), total DM intakes were increased by the inclusion of fodder beet in the diet. However, this increase in DM intake declined with increasing concentrate level, a reflection of the decreasing proportion of fodder beet in the overall diet.…”
Section: Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feeding fodder beet to dairy cows has been shown to increase total DM intake and milk yield (Castle et al, 1961;1963;Roberts, 1987). De Brabander et al (1976;1981) found that fodder beet decreased the intake of basal forage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De plus, la distribution de pulpes sèches a augmenté le flux duodénal de tous les acides aminés, cette augmentation étant significative excepté pour la sérine, la glycine, la cystéine et la méthionine (fig 1 ). (Castle et al, 1963;Castle, 1972) et les pulpes surpressées ensilées (Dulphy et al, 1978;De Brabander et al, 1980) …”
unclassified