The effect of the mentoring service on the academic achievements and self-efficacy perceptions of the students attending the school of foreign languages

Yurtseven, Nihal; Altun, Sertel

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.270

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first group is mentor oriented group [2][3][4][5], which the mentor characteristics are generally defined from ability [3], competency [4], and supervision or manager roles [5]. On the other hand, the second group, which is the mentee oriented group, focuses on only mentee side and the mentee characteristics are generally defined from behavior and performance [6], academic achievement [7] and learner's attitude [8].…”

Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Of online community: Identifying mentor and mentee with compatible different attributes and decision tree

Nuankaew

Temdee

2015

2015 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identifying the mentor and the mentee in the online community is very difficult because of the hidden or lacking personal characteristics but it is very important for the organization. The new members in the organization probably will not only require the knowledge explicitly from their colleagues in the same department, but also the implicit knowledge from online community. The mentor and the mentee can be the same person at the same time, so it is challenging to identify the mentor and the mentee in the online community. This paper thus proposes the method for identifying the mentor and the mentee in the online community based on the assumption that the mentor and the mentee have both common and different attributes. However the different attributes have to be compatible between the mentor and the mentee. The satisfaction of mentor and mentee is collected from 32 mentors and 205 mentees. The classification model is constructed with decision tree. Consequently, the models with different depth levels are tested to determine the appropriate depth level with 10-fold and leave-one-out cross validation methods. The performance results show that the model with 5 depth level is the most appropriate model with 78.90% accuracy.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Of online community: Identifying mentor and mentee with compatible different attributes and decision tree

Nuankaew

Temdee

2015

2015 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Facilitation of democratic learning activities through mentoring

Warouw

Medellu

Makahinda

et al. 2019

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Learning is basically the democratic process but unfortunately the study lacks the students’ diversity, so the academic atmosphere, the students’ body and collage progress are not optimal. The study patterns are still teacher centered unsustainable and lacking initiative. The learning material only emphasizes the concept that comes from the teaching book. Not optimizing the study program, it can also be reflected by the performance of alumni in the field. The performance of learning by the teacher (alumni) is not variable, generally in directional instruction manual. Teacher lacks experience and lack the ability to develop themselves in designing learning materials to utilize the environment around and learning from students’ activities. This study is directed to improve the academic climate to agreement that ultimately will contribute to independence and student learning initiative. The manner of learning is to apply the mentoring system conduct. The performance mechanism (group) USES the approach of the assessment and reflections. The results of the researcher: the performance of the play shows a significant difference between indicators. Indicators that shows the highest mentoring performance is indicator-1: building two-way communication with students. The construction of two-way communication between mentors with a group of students is easy to do by mentors, instead of other indicators like indikaor-4: conditioning the initiative to learn the initiative’s lesson with the relevant material. The difficulty of mentors in an indicator-4 achievement is to identify and design quickly the choice of relevant materials and according to the development of student groups. There were training and early preparation before the performance of the activity, but in the democratic process of learning the potential of problems, issues and new experiences with groups of students. Material is relevant to the problems that arise in learning process are not predictable. The performance of the performance for indicaor-6 was also low, but indicated the significant progress of the initial meeting to the end. Conclusion: the role of the mentors is very important in building communication and interaction with study in groups as well as the traffic of study groups and increasing the study of study and quality of the students’ work.

show abstract

The effect of the mentoring service on the academic achievements and self-efficacy perceptions of the students attending the school of foreign languages

Cited by 2 publications

References 16 publications

Of online community: Identifying mentor and mentee with compatible different attributes and decision tree

Of online community: Identifying mentor and mentee with compatible different attributes and decision tree

Facilitation of democratic learning activities through mentoring

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About