1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf02134277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the loading process and imperfections on the load bearing capacity of beam columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term in the parentheses may be considered an amplification factor on the first order moment for the purpose of obtaining the second-order moment, which is based on a numerical solution of Galambos and Ketter (1961). Additional analytical solutions for wide flange beam-columns have been derived by a number of researchers (Ketter, 1962;Lu and Kamalvand, 1968;Chen, 1970;Chen, 1971a;Chen, 1971b;Yu and Tall, 1971;Young, 1973;Chen and Atsuta, 1972;Ballio et al, 1973;Ballio and Campanini, 1981;and Lu et al, 1983). These formulations provide an acceptable fit for all wide flange sections, including those fabricated by welding, and have been verified with a number of experimental studies with hot-rolled shapes (Johnston and Cheney, 1942;Ketter et al, 1952;Ketter et al, 1955;Galambos and Ketter, 1961;Yu and Tall, 1971;Mason et al, 1958;van Kuren and Galambos, 1964;Dwyer and Galambos, 1965;Bijlaard et al, 1955;and Lay and Galambos, 1965).…”
Section: A-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term in the parentheses may be considered an amplification factor on the first order moment for the purpose of obtaining the second-order moment, which is based on a numerical solution of Galambos and Ketter (1961). Additional analytical solutions for wide flange beam-columns have been derived by a number of researchers (Ketter, 1962;Lu and Kamalvand, 1968;Chen, 1970;Chen, 1971a;Chen, 1971b;Yu and Tall, 1971;Young, 1973;Chen and Atsuta, 1972;Ballio et al, 1973;Ballio and Campanini, 1981;and Lu et al, 1983). These formulations provide an acceptable fit for all wide flange sections, including those fabricated by welding, and have been verified with a number of experimental studies with hot-rolled shapes (Johnston and Cheney, 1942;Ketter et al, 1952;Ketter et al, 1955;Galambos and Ketter, 1961;Yu and Tall, 1971;Mason et al, 1958;van Kuren and Galambos, 1964;Dwyer and Galambos, 1965;Bijlaard et al, 1955;and Lay and Galambos, 1965).…”
Section: A-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a reassessment of the models needed to describe beam‐like structural elements has been used in order to simplify the tools needed to study nonlinear equilibrium shapes, loss of stability, buckling and post‐buckling phenomena like those studied in []. In particular in order to simplify the computation of the buckling load of a beam, its large deformations and its multiple stable equilibria discrete Hencky models have been recovered . Indeed Hencky, in his seminal work [], for making possible some semi‐analytical solutions of the problem of finding large deformations of Euler beams, proposed a very clever and effective way leading to the computation of the buckling load of a rectilinear planar beam…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular in order to simplify the computation of the buckling load of a beam, its large deformations and its multiple stable equilibria discrete Hencky models have been recovered. [16,17,111,114] Indeed Hencky, in his seminal work [72],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%