1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01053316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the level of phosphate rock application on its dissolution in soil and on bicarbonate-soluble phosphorus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percent dissolution of PR decreased with increasing application rate. These results are consistent with the findings of Kanabo and Gilkes (1988). The North Carolina PR showed a similar pat-tern of high reactivity in both soil horizons (Fig.…”
Section: Phosphate Rock Dissolutionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Percent dissolution of PR decreased with increasing application rate. These results are consistent with the findings of Kanabo and Gilkes (1988). The North Carolina PR showed a similar pat-tern of high reactivity in both soil horizons (Fig.…”
Section: Phosphate Rock Dissolutionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Calcium in the extracts was determined using ICP emission spectroscopy. The extent of dissolution was calculated from the P/Ca ratio in the PR assuming free calcite was not present and congruent dissolution of PR occurred (Kanabo and Gilkes, 1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon has been noted by other researchers (Engelstad, Jugsujinda & Datta, 1974;Khasawneh & Sample, 1978;Bolland & Bowden, 1984;Bolland, Weatherley, Gilkes & Bowden, 1986;Yeates & Allen, 1987). A further complication to the estimation of the relative agronomic effectiveness of PR is that the response curves for superphosphate and PR may differ in their functional form owing to differences in their dissolution behaviour in soils (Kanabo & Gilkes, 1988a). Thus, the effectiveness of PR does not remain constant, but varies according to the point on the response curve at which the comparison is made (Bolland & Barrow, 1988;Bolland & Gilkes, 1989).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Dry Matter Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Factors affecting PR dissolution in soil include particle size, PR rate and chemical reactivity, pH, titrable acidity, and P buffering capacity, among others (Bolland and Gilkes, 1990;Chien and Menon, 1995;Mackay and Syers, 1986). Kanabo and Gilkes (1988) studied the dissolution of North Carolina RP in a lateritic soil and found that after 35 days of incubation, the percentage of the added PR dissolved ranged from 19% for particle size of less than 0.038 mm to 12% for particle size of 0.15 to 0.25 mm. The strong effect of particle size on PR dissolution was also found in the study of Watkinson (1994), who estimated the dissolution time to be 0.56 year for 0.075-mm particle size and 2.25 years for 0.15-mm particle size.…”
Section: Release Of CD From Tsp and Pr In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%