“…For examples, Callao, Jarne, and Laínez (2007) showed that adopting IFRS significantly affected financial reports in Spain; Voulgaris, Stathopoulos, and Walker (2014) indicated that the pro-IFRS firms' financial positions in Spain were largely different from those following local accounting standards; Daske, Hail, Leuz, and Verdi (2008) found that adopting IFRS resulted in poor corporate performance in their sample companies of 26 countries. Among all, whether or not earnings management is minimized after IFRS adoption remains the main issue that is under scrutiny (see for examples, Capkun, Collins, & Jeanjean, 2016;Jeanjean & Stolowy, 2008); however, to the best of our awareness, the literature is relatively scarce, except for Antonios et al (2011) who found that IFRS is effective in reducing manipulative related-party transactions; and they also suggested that IFRS could provide an efficient solution to related-party transactions disclosure issue. As compared with the traditional company law in Taiwan that did not clearly define related-party transactions, the purpose of International Accounting Standard 24 is to ensure that the financial statements include necessary disclosures relating to the existence (both control and significant influence) of related parties and transactions with such related parties.…”