2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2794071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Interbank Network Structure on Contagion and Common Shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, survey data are not available as granular, transaction-level data, but are reported as aggregate figures. Transaction-level data are important as the microstructure of interbank markets should be taken into account when designing policy measures, as shown for example by Georg (2011). This is especially true in times of stress.…”
Section: Survey Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, survey data are not available as granular, transaction-level data, but are reported as aggregate figures. Transaction-level data are important as the microstructure of interbank markets should be taken into account when designing policy measures, as shown for example by Georg (2011). This is especially true in times of stress.…”
Section: Survey Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the literature has made an effort to understand and include in the economic models the sources of contagion. Regardless of the modeling approach used, which ranges from New Keynesian models solved globally or using reduced functional form (see, for instance, Boissay et al (2016), Gertler et al (2020), Svensson (2017)) to agentbased models and the most recent network-oriented approaches (see Battiston et al (2012a,b), Georg (2013), Haldane and May (2011), Upper (2011), Capponi et al (2020, Calice et al (2020)), there is a general agreement that identifies interaction and heterogeneity as the drivers of endogenous crises. Moreover, the post-Lehman studies have placed particular emphasis on the propagation of contagion, determining the direction of the attack from financial to real markets and its fuse in the portfolio structure of financial institutions (see Brunnermeier et al (2012)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still in the agent-based modeling, Georg (2013) and Bluhm, Faia and Krahnen (2014) share similarities with our research, as they analyze the central bank as a liquidity provider in an interbank network. Liquidity provision makes banks more resilient to shocks.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 72%
“…For instance, scale-free networks are the most fragile when markets are illiquid. Georg (2013) finds that, while in normal times different network topologies have a similar performance regarding systemic risk, the network topology becomes quite important in times of crisis. In these circumstances, contagion seems to be stronger in random networks, whereas scale-free networks are more resilient.…”
Section: Network Topology and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation