2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(00)00498-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the hydrophobicity of microchannels and components in water and oil phases on droplet formation in microchannel water-in-oil emulsification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
78
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The viscosity and pH of surfactant and protein aqueous solutions were almost identical, whereas there was a considerable difference in the surface tension among these solutions. The previous studies for liquid-liquid systems show that the droplet size is affected by viscosity (Kawakatsu et al, 2001) and is not affected by interfacial tension . Therefore, we investigated the effect of surface tension and viscosity in detail, the discussion of which is presented below.…”
Section: Monodispersed Microbubble Formation Using the MC Techniquementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The viscosity and pH of surfactant and protein aqueous solutions were almost identical, whereas there was a considerable difference in the surface tension among these solutions. The previous studies for liquid-liquid systems show that the droplet size is affected by viscosity (Kawakatsu et al, 2001) and is not affected by interfacial tension . Therefore, we investigated the effect of surface tension and viscosity in detail, the discussion of which is presented below.…”
Section: Monodispersed Microbubble Formation Using the MC Techniquementioning
confidence: 85%
“…This good correlation means that the difference between the average bubble size and the average droplet size is well explained by the viscosity difference. Previous studies for liquid-liquid systems reported that the droplet size was affected by the viscosities of both phases (Kawakatsu et al, 2001) and independent of the interfacial tension . With respect to the microbubble formation using SDS, the average bubble size was not affected by the surface tension in the SDS concentration range of 0.02-0.3 wt % (surface tension range of 36.2-48.9 mN/m), and the average bubble size increased with increasing continuous-phase viscosity.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface/interfacial Tension and Continuousphase VImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ohne spezielle Behandlung der Oberfläche ist diese hydrophil und somit für das Herstellen von O/W-Emulsionen geeignet. K A W A K A T S U et al [19] verwendeten unterschiedliche Formen der Oberflächen-modifikation und konnten auf diese Weise monodisperse W/O-Emulsionen herstellen.…”
Section: Prozessparameterunclassified
“…This small impurity had a pronounced stabilizing effect on the gel phase. In addition, the phase behaviour of commercial tetraglycerol [78], pentaglycerol [79] and decaglycerol fatty acid esters [80] have been reported.…”
Section: Polyglycerol Fatty Acid Estersmentioning
confidence: 99%