1987
DOI: 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90095-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the fiber/matrix interface on the flexural fatigue performance of unidirectional fiberglass composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relations of the debond rate and debond length with the number of cycles (Figs. 4,6,9 and 10) show that no matter what kind of the loading conditions is, interfacial damage for FRM composites under cyclic loading undergoes three stages. Debonding will not occur at the first stage.…”
Section: Modeling Of Interfacial Debonding Under Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relations of the debond rate and debond length with the number of cycles (Figs. 4,6,9 and 10) show that no matter what kind of the loading conditions is, interfacial damage for FRM composites under cyclic loading undergoes three stages. Debonding will not occur at the first stage.…”
Section: Modeling Of Interfacial Debonding Under Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some experimental investigations also found that the responses of FRM composites under conditions of cyclic loading are quite different from that under monotonic loading [5][6][7][8][9][10]. For example, the fatigue resistance of SiC fiber-reinforced Ti alloy composites is reduced significantly due to SiC fiber fractured at an early stage of fatigue [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shih and Ebert in a different study on unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastic found that strong fibre/ matrix interface improves the flexure fatigue performance of the composite [10]. Caprino and Giorleo proposed a model for four-point bending fatigue behavior of glass fiber reinforced plastic composites [11]. The model is shown to be able to account for the effect of stress ratio on the fatigue lifetime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While the properties of the fibre and matrix are obviously important governing factors of the failure process, it is the interfacial bond behaviour which ultimately determines the synergism of fibre and matrix properties as they blend together to produce composite behaviour. Investigations of fracture phenomena of FRP composite materials have demonstrated that interface behaviour affects composite stlttness [1,2], strength [3,4], toughness [3,4], fatigue resistance [5], and environmental stability [6][7][8]. The importance of interfacial bond behaviour is summed up by Drzal [7] who concludes that "the exact nature of this region (interfacial bond region) must be understood if accurate life prediction models (of composite behaviour) are to be developed".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%