2017
DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201700500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Dielectric Constant and Ion Mobility in Light‐Emitting Electrochemical Cells

Abstract: Light‐emitting electrochemical cells (LEECs) are a promising low‐cost option for display and solid‐state lighting. In these devices, the interplay of mobile ions, electrons, and holes makes for rich physics that can be leveraged for high performance. One example of this interplay is in the formation and radiative decay of excitons–bound electron and hole pairs. Considerations from exciton binding and Langevin recombination suggest that a low dielectric constant (ϵ) would enhance emission. However, emission is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This goes hand‐in‐hand with a more prominent lower resistance at any further applied voltage for 3 compared to 2 —, e.g., 2.3 × 10 5 versus 6.5 × 10 4 Ω at 2.5 V; Table S1 (Supporting Information) and Figure . This is, indeed, in perfect agreement with the dielectric constant (ε r ) values, which are almost twice for 3 compared to 2 —, i.e., 9.8 versus 5.3, despite both show the same ionic conductivity at 0 V. Since there is a direct relationship between the rearrangement of a molecule and its dipole moment and ε r , we can state that 3 rearranges faster upon applying an external electric field, and, therefore, it is more suitable for enhancing charge injection . This may be related to a different cation–anion distribution in Cu(I)‐iTMCs upon changing the P ^ P ligand from POP to Xantphos.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This goes hand‐in‐hand with a more prominent lower resistance at any further applied voltage for 3 compared to 2 —, e.g., 2.3 × 10 5 versus 6.5 × 10 4 Ω at 2.5 V; Table S1 (Supporting Information) and Figure . This is, indeed, in perfect agreement with the dielectric constant (ε r ) values, which are almost twice for 3 compared to 2 —, i.e., 9.8 versus 5.3, despite both show the same ionic conductivity at 0 V. Since there is a direct relationship between the rearrangement of a molecule and its dipole moment and ε r , we can state that 3 rearranges faster upon applying an external electric field, and, therefore, it is more suitable for enhancing charge injection . This may be related to a different cation–anion distribution in Cu(I)‐iTMCs upon changing the P ^ P ligand from POP to Xantphos.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For example, iTMC LECs present a case where the large cation is essentially immobile. [15,40,61] This has the consequence that the EDL formation at the cathode is slow and imbalanced charge injection can potentially prevail very long.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the change in capacitance level at intermediate frequencies is commonly related to the evolution of the intrinsic region with low conductivity. [11,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Studies on poly(para-phenylenevinylene)-type LECs combined IS measurement with equivalent circuit or drift-diffusion modelling, providing a solid understanding of the dynamic LEC junction. [34,36] One conclusion is that the width of the low-conductive region must not be equal to the width of the region with high recombination, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, by attachment of pendant imidazolium ions, ionic triethylammonium groups, and tri-n butylphosphonium to the periphery of the ancillary ligand and by the use of small counter anions, the turn-on time of iTMC-LEC devices was significantly improved. 16,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The operation stability as an essential figure of merit in LEC devices is described by the lifetime (t 1/2 ), which is defined as the time to reach half of the maximum brightness. In general, the mobility of the ions in the active layer and the robustness of the complexes affect the stability of iTMC-LEC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%