Abstract:Background:
New York State passed the Breast Cancer Provider Discussion Law in 2010, mandating discussion of insurance coverage for reconstruction and expedient plastic surgical referral, two significant factors found to affect reconstruction rates. This study examines the impact of this law.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study of the New York State Planning and Research Cooperative System database to examine breast reconstruction rates 3 years before… Show more
“…Reconstruction rates increased significantly for AA women after implementation of the law, demonstrating the effectiveness of provider-driven patient education. 29 With previous studies describing differences in referral for surgery, geographical access to reconstructive surgeons also has been explored in the literature. In 2017, Bauder et al compared inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from ten states and demonstrated that higher plastic surgeon density was positively correlated with breast reconstruction rates.…”
Section: Access To Breast Reconstructionmentioning
For many women, breast reconstruction is an essential component of the breast cancer care continuum after mastectomy. Despite postmastectomy breast reconstruction now being a standard of care, numerous studies over the past decade have documented persistent racial disparities in breast reconstruction rates, physician referral patterns, and patient knowledge of their reconstructive options. These disparities have disproportionately impacted women of color-most specifically, African American women. Recent data have revealed racial differences in patient comorbidities, informed decision-making satisfaction, and clinical outcomes after breast reconstruction. Explicitly, African American women have significantly more risk factors for complications and less baseline knowledge regarding reconstructive options than white women. With a recent heightened attention focused on social determinants of health, studies designed to improve these racial differences have demonstrated promising results through educational outreach to underserved communities, implementation of tailored legislation promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity, and encouragement of additional recruitment of ethnically underrepresented-inmedicine surgeons. This study uses a targeted review of the literature to provide a summary of racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African American women, with our perspective on opportunities for improvement.
“…Reconstruction rates increased significantly for AA women after implementation of the law, demonstrating the effectiveness of provider-driven patient education. 29 With previous studies describing differences in referral for surgery, geographical access to reconstructive surgeons also has been explored in the literature. In 2017, Bauder et al compared inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from ten states and demonstrated that higher plastic surgeon density was positively correlated with breast reconstruction rates.…”
Section: Access To Breast Reconstructionmentioning
For many women, breast reconstruction is an essential component of the breast cancer care continuum after mastectomy. Despite postmastectomy breast reconstruction now being a standard of care, numerous studies over the past decade have documented persistent racial disparities in breast reconstruction rates, physician referral patterns, and patient knowledge of their reconstructive options. These disparities have disproportionately impacted women of color-most specifically, African American women. Recent data have revealed racial differences in patient comorbidities, informed decision-making satisfaction, and clinical outcomes after breast reconstruction. Explicitly, African American women have significantly more risk factors for complications and less baseline knowledge regarding reconstructive options than white women. With a recent heightened attention focused on social determinants of health, studies designed to improve these racial differences have demonstrated promising results through educational outreach to underserved communities, implementation of tailored legislation promoting inclusion, diversity, and equity, and encouragement of additional recruitment of ethnically underrepresented-inmedicine surgeons. This study uses a targeted review of the literature to provide a summary of racial disparities in breast reconstruction for African American women, with our perspective on opportunities for improvement.
“…In patients who elect to undergo breast reconstruction, the improvement in quality of life for many is substantial 5–7. As access to reconstructive breast care has increased in the USA, the rate of breast reconstruction following mastectomy has dramatically increased over the past 20 years 8 9. However, despite increasing overall rates of reconstruction, rates of breast reconstruction vary in different patient populations and due to different institutional structures 10 11.…”
IntroductionBreast reconstruction plays an important role for many in restoring form and function of the breast after mastectomy. However, rates of breast reconstruction in the USA vary significantly by race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The lower rates of breast reconstruction in non-white women and in women of lower socioeconomic status may reflect a complex interplay between patient and physician factors and access to care. It remains unknown what community-specific barriers may be impacting receipt of breast reconstruction.Methods and analysisThis is a mixed-methods study combining qualitative patient interview data with quantitative practice patterns to develop an actionable plan to address disparities in breast reconstruction in the local community. The primary aims are to (1) capture barriers to breast reconstruction for patients in the local community, (2) quantitatively evaluate practice patterns at the host institution and (3) identify issues and prioritise interventions for change using community-based engagement.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained at the investigators’ institution. Results from both the quantitative and qualitative portions of the study will be circulated via peer-review publication. These findings will also serve as pilot data for extramural funding to implement and evaluate these proposed solutions.
“…Research suggests that patient‐provider discussions have a significant impact on patient decisions to undergo procedures (1,2). Therefore, counseling the patient about bariatric surgery as a treatment option in outpatient settings is expected to be a crucial step in a patient’s decision to undergo the procedure (3,4), and survey studies have found that patients are more likely to undergo bariatric surgery when it is recommended by their health care provider (5).…”
Research suggests that patient-provider discussions have a significant impact on patient decisions to undergo procedures (1,2). Therefore, counseling the patient about bariatric surgery as a treatment option in outpatient settings is expected to be a crucial step in a patient's decision to undergo the procedure (3,4), and survey studies have found that patients are more likely to undergo bariatric surgery when it is recommended by their health care provider (5). However, little is known about how often providers discuss bariatric surgery with patients who are eligible for the procedure. A major reason for the paucity of research in this area is that information on provider discussion of bariatric surgery is not easily available. This information is typically not reflected in administrative or structured data in the electronic health record (EHR). Instead, bariatric surgery discussions are primarily recorded in narrative notes, requiring labor-intensive chart reviews to study them.However, over the past decade, technology for the computational analysis of narrative electronic documents (natural language processing [NLP]) has become available, providing a powerful new tool to investigate patient care processes that are documented only
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.