1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00656882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the alarm substance on the central nervous excitation of the black tetraGymnocorymbus ternetzi (Characidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces) indicated by dorsal light response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The faster swimming speeds observed in the predator treatment could be the result of factors other than tail depth (or length) (Van Buskirk & McCollum 2000), such as accelerating the development of functional hind limbs to aid in locomotion. Conversely, the predator treatment individuals may have a heightened sensitivity or alertness to a potential predator stimulus, due to exposure to predation‐associated chemical cues (Pfeiffer & Riegelbauer 1978; Hews & Blaustein 1985; Hews 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The faster swimming speeds observed in the predator treatment could be the result of factors other than tail depth (or length) (Van Buskirk & McCollum 2000), such as accelerating the development of functional hind limbs to aid in locomotion. Conversely, the predator treatment individuals may have a heightened sensitivity or alertness to a potential predator stimulus, due to exposure to predation‐associated chemical cues (Pfeiffer & Riegelbauer 1978; Hews & Blaustein 1985; Hews 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced activity rates (Lawrence and Smith, 1989), increased emphasis on visual stimuli (Pfeiffer and Riegelbauer, 1978;Pfeiffer et aL, 1985a), changes in group size (Magurran and Pitcher, 1987) or modifications in foraging tactics (Milinski and Heller, 1978;Jakobsen and Johnsen, 1989;Lima and Dill, 1990) may be appropriate responses to danger but not conspicuous enough to be detected without quantitative analysis. Reduced activity rates (Lawrence and Smith, 1989), increased emphasis on visual stimuli (Pfeiffer and Riegelbauer, 1978;Pfeiffer et aL, 1985a), changes in group size (Magurran and Pitcher, 1987) or modifications in foraging tactics (Milinski and Heller, 1978;Jakobsen and Johnsen, 1989;Lima and Dill, 1990) may be appropriate responses to danger but not conspicuous enough to be detected without quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Smithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different aspects of the integrated stress response have been observed in fish after detection of alarm substance, including elevated plasma cortisol and glucose (Rehnberg et al, 1987), increased respiration rate (Lebedeva et al, 1993) and sharpened optical alertness (indicated by dorsal light responsiveness; Pfeiffer and Riegelbauer, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%