1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(84)90468-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of temperature oscillations at the growth interface on crystal perfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature gradients in the crystal and melt have been measured directly. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Although the correlation between G s and V is positive in Refs. 4-6, 14, 15, the negative correlation between G s and V is reported, 11,16) which is against with the simplified conservation of energy at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature gradients in the crystal and melt have been measured directly. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Although the correlation between G s and V is positive in Refs. 4-6, 14, 15, the negative correlation between G s and V is reported, 11,16) which is against with the simplified conservation of energy at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first benefit of a magnetic field is the elimination of turbulence and all large-scale periodicity in the melt motion (Hirata & Hoshikawa 1992). Temporal fluctuations in the heat transfer and oxygen or dopant transport from the melt to the growing crystal produce many microscopic structural defects and microscopic concentration variations in the crystal (Kuroda, Kozuka & Takano 1984). Recent advances in integrated-circuit manufacturing have dramatically increased the number of transistors per cm2 of wafer surface and have led to the need to eliminate microscopic defects and concentration variations in the CZ crystals from which the wafers are sliced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field suppresses turbulence in the melt and the associated fluctuations in the heat flux across the crystal-melt interface. Because of these fluctuations, without a magnetic field the crystal alternately grows and remelts, which produces more microdefects in the crystal (Kuroda, Kozuka & Takano 1984). A crystal grown in a magnetic Czochralski puller has a lower microdefect density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%