1980
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1980.130180509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of temperature and thermal history on the WAXS pattern of polycarbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scattering patterns for the as-supplied, quenched and annealed materials are very similar, apart from die nature of the weak peak at s -0.7 ]~-~. It has been shown previously that the area of the peak was reduced at higher temperatures [8]. Extending the work of Saffell and Windle [8] and Turska et al [9] we have monitored this peak as a function of annealing time and temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scattering patterns for the as-supplied, quenched and annealed materials are very similar, apart from die nature of the weak peak at s -0.7 ]~-~. It has been shown previously that the area of the peak was reduced at higher temperatures [8]. Extending the work of Saffell and Windle [8] and Turska et al [9] we have monitored this peak as a function of annealing time and temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It has been shown previously that the area of the peak was reduced at higher temperatures [8]. Extending the work of Saffell and Windle [8] and Turska et al [9] we have monitored this peak as a function of annealing time and temperature. To define the area of the peak, an artificial background was constructed ( fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model is a section of a poly(bisphenol A carbonate) chain in zig-zag conformation of overall length 40 A. The experimental scattering pattern from this material exhibits a temperature-sensitive peak at --0.5/k -1 (Saffell & Windle, 1980), which is thought to arise from interferences within a chain. The small cross section of the model chain means that the scattering calculated from (2) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%